An Overview of Holy Saturday

Of all the Triduum services, Holy Saturday is probably the most omitted in common practice today; liturgically it is overshadowed by its lengthy neighboring services for Good Friday and the Easter Vigil, logistically it can seem to stand in the way of preparations for the Easter service(s), and culturally it is a moment many people do not know what to do with.  Holy Saturday is the awkward “in-between” moment.  Jesus has died, but has not yet risen.  The Gospel lesson for this service, as most might expect, tells the brief story of his burial, but therein lies the problem, for our culture is one that does not handle death well.  Funerals are replaced with celebrations of life, burials are replaced with memorial services, so when it comes to the burial of our Lord, whom we know will rise again on the third day, it is all the more difficult for the modern Western heart and mind to sit still at his graveside.  This brief worship service, thus, provides for us precisely what we need to re-learn about death and mourning.  If the Good Friday service is the main event, the primary Burial service, Holy Saturday is the Committal at the graveside – the smaller, simpler, and more intimate moment of standing outside the tomb and reflecting on what has happened.  And yet Holy Saturday has other surprises in store: the doctrine of Christ’s descent into hell (Article of Religion III) is one that is often neglected in modern theological discourse, and this day in the Church Calendar focuses on that like no other.

The Collect of the Day

The two choices of collect emphasize different aspects of Holy Saturday’s Gospel narrative.  The first picks up the theme of Sabbath rest, which Jesus fulfills by “resting” on the seventh day – of his three days in the tomb, Saturday is the only one in which our Lord was dead for the full 24 hours!  We pray that we may “await with him” and “rise with him,” setting up the worshiper for a much-needed lesson in what it means to wait with Christ.  The second collect directs us, instead, toward the activity of Christ’s spirit during his bodily rest.  Here, our prayer is to “wait in hope” and to receive “a share in the glory” of God’s children.

The theme of waiting is common to both collects, but they play out in different contexts, and the officiant should choose which collect to pray based upon which emphasis (bodily rest in the tomb or spiritual activity in hell) will be prevalent in the homily.

The Lessons

Job 14:1-14 is an apt lament for a burial.  It recognizes the shortness of life, the boundaries set by God which mortals cannot cross, and bewails the apparent permanency of death.  Only at the end does it cry out to God, “appoint me a set time, and remember me” and ask “If a man die, shall he live again?”

The Psalms do not answer this question, but give the worshipers further voice to join in Job’s lament.  Psalm 130 is the classic prayer of the dead, balancing the helplessness of “the deep” with God’s mercy and plenteous redemption.  Psalm 88 is a prayer of one betrayed, whose companions are darkness and hidden, daring to ask if and when God’s loving-kindness will be revealed in the grave.  And the beginning of Psalm 31, also appointed in Compline, is an expression of trust amidst confusion; in it we pray with Jesus to the Father “into your hands I commend my spirit.”  The officiant may, as with the Collect, select which Psalm to use based upon the emphasis of the coming sermon; or, because, there are three Psalms to choose from, they may be rotated across Years A, B, and C.

1 Peter 4:1-8 begins to answer the questions and cries of Job and the Psalms: “the gospel was preached even to those who are dead, that though judged in the flesh the way people are, they might live in the spirit the way God does.”  Jesus’ descent among the dead means that the Gospel reaches even the faithful departed.  With such a hope in hand, or, knowing that “the end of all things is at hand,” we are therefore able to receive the ethical teachings of the Apostle in the spirit it was intended: not as bare rules for holy living, but as expressions of divine love fueled by the hope which Christ’s death, descent, and resurrection provides.

The Gospel, either from Matthew 27 or from John 19, may feel anticlimactic after the previous sequence.  The burial narrative is short and simple, and frankly unremarkable after the emotional roller coaster of Job, the Psalm(s), and Saint Peter.  Yet the mundanity of the Gospel lesson is precisely what the worshiper needs to understand in this moment: the glorious work of God is regularly hidden underneath appearances of normality.  An ordinary life plays host to the miraculous work of the Spirit; an ordinary bread plays host to the miraculous body of Christ; an ordinary grave plays host to the salvation of the living and dead.

The Homily and Anthem

In many ways, the Anthem (taken from the Prayer Book’s graveside service) is itself a homily, albeit in devotional form.  It begins with the words of Job, paraphrased, then moves through expressions of faith and hope much like the three Psalms provide.  It concludes in petition to our “holy and merciful Savior” that we may never fall away from him in our own pain and death.  Thus the worshipers apply the Scripture Lessons to themselves in the very reading or singing of this Anthem.

That having been said, many people are not sufficiently liturgically formed to recognize what this Anthem is doing in and through them, and therefore a homily may be said first.

The Prayers

The worship service ends with the Lord’s Prayer and the traditional Blessing from the Daily Office.  The doxology is omitted from the Lord’s Prayer for the same reason as in the Good Friday service – it is a gesture of solemnity and a restraining of celebration, reserving the joyous outcries of praise for the arrival of Easter in the night to come.

An Overview of Good Friday

The 2019 BCP’s introductory text helpfully explains the meaning and purpose behind several Lenten, Passiontide, and Good Friday traditions regarding the appearance and sound of the church.  In line with unbroken tradition through Patristic, Medieval, Reformation, and even modern piety, we are invited to remember our own role in the suffering and agony of Christ.  The Lord’s Supper, after all, is a “participation” or “communion” in the body and blood of Christ, so its larger liturgical context marks our participation or communion in the larger gospel events.  God’s people in every age and every place are therefore invited and enabled to join him at his table on Thursday, follow him to his Cross today, keep watch outside his tomb tomorrow, and partake of his resurrection as midnight (and Sunday) approach.  Knowing this full scope ahead of time, unlike the disciples some two thousand years ago, the worshiper today is able to recognize the Cross as “a sign of life, in the midst of death” and celebrate it accordingly.

The Entrance

Apart from the Daily Office of Morning Prayer, the church has been silent since the Stripping of the Altar the night before, save the whispering of night watches or vigils being kept by the faithful few.  The entrance of the ministers in silence respects that watchful tone, and their kneeling for silent prayer marks their joining of the congregation in that pious vigil.  Silence is also intensely personal, which part of what makes it so difficult to maintain in public worship: the only sounds to be heard are the prayers, questions, and distractions in each person’s own head!  But that is a particular charism of the Triduum liturgy – all are invited to invest themselves in these critical gospel moments and consider deeply their participation and responses to every word and deed of Christ.

The silence is broken either with the iconic penitential words of Isaiah or with the simple bidding “Let us pray.”

The Collect of the Day

The petition of this prayer is deceptively simple: we ask God to “behold” us.  In the context of this service, following a potential all-night vigil kept mostly in silence, asking God to look at us, to see us, to behold or take notice of us, is a deeply emotion-laden plea.  The Officiant would do well to read this collect slowly, allowing the gravity of its significance time to land in the hearts and minds of all who are gathered.  For further commentary on this collect, see the Collects for the Christian Year.

The Lessons

Two options for the Old Testament are provided.  They are listed in canonical order, which is not necessarily an order of precedence, so there are several means by which worship planners may choose between them.  One consideration is that the reading from Isaiah will have been read five days earlier on Palm Sunday, so to read it again here would give it a particular emphasis, or to read from Genesis 22 instead would be to provide a wider range of scriptural content to Holy Week.  It is worth noting, further, that both of these lessons are strongly represented through the history of the Daily Office Lectionary in the Prayer Book tradition.

All three of these Psalm readings were first appointed in the 1979 Prayer Book, and may be most simply used in rotation in line with the three-year lectionary.

Hebrews 10:1-25 is the traditional Epistle lesson for this day, addressing the subject of priestly sacrifice and the sprinkling of the faithful with the blood of the covenant for their cleansing.  This provides a theological context for the Passion of Christ as well as directions for a personal devotional response to it – the worshiper is invited to consider the “good” provided in the events of Good Friday.

The long option for the Gospel lesson is in line with the tradition of medieval practice and the first Prayer Books, whereas the shorter option is in line with Anglican practice since 1662.

The omission of the congregation responses before and after this reading is a return both to classical Prayer Book practice and to pre-Reformation custom.  This leaves the congregation once again with moments of silence surrounding the Passion of Saint John.

The rubrics regarding the manner of reading the Passion Gospel and the congregation’s sitting, standing, and kneeling at different points throughout are the same as in the Palm Sunday service.  Historically, the three-voice chanting of the Passion Gospel was practiced with all four accounts (Matthew’s on Sunday, Mark’s on Tuesday, Luke’s on Wednesday, and John’s on Friday).  The stark solemnity of this day, compared to Palm Sunday, better befits the simple chanting or reading of the Gospel by the reader, Deacon, and Priest, rather than the more elaborate affairs now commonly practiced on Palm Sunday.

The Sermon

The option to sing a hymn after the sermon is an opportunity to provide more active congregational participation.  This enables another opportunity to sing one of the many excellent Passiontide songs in Christian hymnody – opportunities which are in relative short supply in this worship service – as well as gives the people a break from the silence.

The Solemn Collects

From the angle of devotion and piety, Good Friday has many avenues to explore: sorrow and penitence for our sins, Christ’s triumph over death through death, creation’s participation and redemption in Christ through the Cross and other natural and supernatural phenomena during the crucifixion, and the work of God to bring salvation to a world otherwise condemned.  It is the latter direction that is taken up now as the officiant announces the call to prayer.

In Early Church and Medieval practice, the Deacon would direct the people to kneel for silent prayer after each bidding, and then to rise for each collect.  The rubric provided here simplifies that, allowing for any appropriate combination of standing or kneeling during this portion of the liturgy.

The first intercession: for the church

This bidding sets forth a vision of the Church not often considered in the modern evangelical imagination: not only are we to pray for her preservation in unity, peace, and safety, but also that the Church is the context in which God makes all powers and principalities subject to himself (1 Corinthians 15:27-28, Ephesians 6:12, 1 Peter 3:22).  The resulting goal is peace, or tranquilitas, a term frequently used in the history of Christian devotion to refer to a sense of quiet, wholeness, and unfettered access and attention between the soul and God.  This is thus both an eternal heavenly state to look forward to as well as a temporal state to be glimpsed within one’s own life and experience.

Archbishop Laud’s collect, then, meticulously covers several angles by which one might pray for the Church, dealing with its proclamation of the truth, its corruption, error, perverseness, rightness, need, and division.

The second intercession: for the Bishops

As in the Prayers of the People, these prayers move from the general to the particular.  The people are invited to pray for their Bishop and Archbishop, representing the “governance of God’s holy people.”  This is, therefore, a time of prayer specifically for the church’s leadership; prayer for its ministry and work will come next.

The collect answers this bidding by acknowledging God’s judgment over all creation and Christ’s role as the true Shepherd and Bishop of our souls, and praying for those aspects of his work and ministry to be carried out rightly by his appointed Bishops.  Our own “fruit of righteousness” is named as the goal of a well-ordered and rightly-governed Church, which then leads the way to the next intercession.

The third intercession: for all the clergy

Now all orders of the Church are named.  There were several “minor orders” also named in the ancient version of this Office, but as those have been discontinued they are no longer named here.

This collect was better known in the 1979 Prayer Book as one of the Prayers for Mission in Morning Prayer.  While terms such as “vocation and ministry” are most typically used to refer to members of the clergy, they may also be rightly used to describe the work and calling of all Christians.

The fourth intercession: for the state

Similar to the first set of prayers for the Church, prayer for a national government is also directed toward the glory of God and his eternal purposes.  We are bid, here, to pray that our leaders would realize their fealty to God and to seek his honor and glory, so that we can honor them with faithful obedience as God’s Word directs us to do.

The prayer, then, contrasts our brief earthly kingdoms with God’s everlasting kingdom and infinite power.  We pray for the safety of our country and its leaders, as well as for the spiritual gifts necessary for right governance and for their adherence to God’s calling upon their lives to be public servants operating in the fear of the Lord, which is the beginning of wisdom.  Like the Prayers of the People in the Communion rites (and unlike the ancient versions of these prayers), this collect does not assume that the President, Prime Minister, Sovereign, or other sort of governor is a Christian.  Rather, we pray for Christ’s direction in their lives either in line with their professed faith or in spite of their lack of faith in him.

The fifth intercession: for those preparing for Holy Baptism

It is highly likely that many congregations will not have any catechumens or converts preparing for Baptism or Confirmation on any given Good Friday.  Thus this intercession helps pull the worshiper (and entire congregation) out of their own local context and into the global, Catholic, context of the whole Church.  We pray for open hearts, so that the “washing of regeneration” (Titus 3:5) may bring such persons not only the forgiveness of sins (Acts 2:38) but also to a state of faithful servanthood (Matthew 25:19-23).

The collect repeats most of what the bidding contains, but using different terms: “open their hearts” becomes “gifts of faith and understanding”, God’s “grace and mercy” become instruction in his “holy Word”, the “washing of regeneration” becomes “born again”, and “faithful servants” become “adopted children.”

The sixth intercession: for deliverance from all evils

In terms of the Prayers of the People and the Great Litany, this is parallel to the prayers for “all those who are in trouble, sorrow, need, sickness, or any other adversity.”  The scope of this intercession, however, is made even wider in naming such natural disasters as pestilence and famine.  The earliest forms of this bidding also included those on pilgrimages and those traveling by ship at sea, but since long-distance travel is normally much safer today, those concerns have been truncated to a single phrase here.

As God specially hears the “deep sighing of the poor” in Psalm 12:5 and of the oppressed in Exodus 22:27, and mirroring the expression “let my cry come to you” in several other psalms, this Solemn Collect recognizes the privilege that the prayers of those in need have before the Lord.  Not only that, but our own strength to serve them and relieve their needs is also a subject of prayer for divine aid (cf. Matthew 25:31-40).

The seventh intercession: for those in heresy or schism

Even from the earliest centuries of Christianity, the Church has been sadly plagued with heresy and riven with schismatic movements.  This bidding to prayer puts one in mind of the error and division of Christianity’s many denominations in our day, as well as the countless sects and religions that have been created falsely claiming the name of Christ.  On a more personal level, this bidding refers us not only to churches and assemblies but also to individuals – people known to the congregation who are walking (or have walked) away from the Christian faith to some degree or another.

The collect begins with the familiar phraseology of the Ash Wednesday Collect and petitions God’s mercy on those who have been deceived.  The Church’s desire, as God’s, is that none should perish by that all should be saved by being restored in the wisdom and way of Christ and his bride, the Church.

The eighth intercession: for the Jewish people

The early Christian vision of the world saw three people in three categories: Christian, Jewish, and Pagan.  Christians, of course, hold the full revelation of God in Jesus Christ.  Jews hold a partial revelation of God but reject the truth to which it points; Pagans hold no special revelation and have only the natural law to guide them.  Thus it was traditional to pray for Jews and Pagans in different ways, according to their respective situations.  Where the ancient version of this intercession was more negative, emphasizing the need to remove darkness (or veil) under which the Jewish religion exists, this bidding is more positive, asking for God’s grace to bring them to know the Lord Jesus as the object of their as-yet-unfulfilled faith.

The collect, likewise, looks back to God’s covenant with Abraham, on which both the Jewish and Christian conceptions of covenantal union with God are based (cf. Romans 4).  We recognize that the world was blessed through the Jews (John 4:22), and pray that they will receive that same blessing of salvation themselves.

The ninth intercession: for all unbelievers

Where the ancient liturgy prayed for “pagans” we now pray for nonbelievers without attempting to label them, thus acknowledging the broad religious (and non-religious) scope of the world around us without resorting to generalizations or oversimplification.  Whatever strands of truth a given religion, sect, or philosophy might rightly grasp, the basic issue is that the Gospel of Jesus Christ – in whose name alone one may be saved (Acts 4:12) – is not believed among these people.  Thus we are called upon to pray for their enlightenment.

The collect is similarly phrased to encompass all non-believers fairly and accurately.  These are “all who do not know you as you are revealed in your Son” and we pray for the Gospel’s grace and power to be present in their midst (Acts 6:8).  We pray for hearts to be turned, for the lost to return home, and for the unity of the human race in one flock under one Shepherd (John 10:16).

The tenth intercession: for the resurrection

As the Prayers of the People and Great Litany conclude with prayers for the departed and our share with them in eternity, so too does our version of the Solemn Collects conclude with an eye toward the life to come.  We pray not simply for holy lives for the present’s sake, but for lives of faith that lead to a state of worthiness to enter into the joy of our Lord (Matthew 25:21, 23).  And by naming the departed in this prayer, we are reminded that they also have not yet reached that blessed state of eternal bliss

The collect provides further context for the scope of our salvation: the Church is a mystery (Ephesians 5:32) in which God sovereignly works out his plan of salvation (Ephesians 1:10).  Specifically, this prayer describes “things which were cast down” as “being raised up”, which not only echoes the Magnificat and the Canticle of Hannah (1 Samuel 2:1-10) but also poetically recasts Saint Paul’s teachings on redemption by recapitulation in Christ (Romans 5:12-21).  Thus we see the Christian life and reality as one of restoration and reconciliation rather than simply death and resurrection.

Devotions Before the Cross

The use of a wooden (and not metal or stone) cross for the purposes of adoration is significant, and this is reflected in the words of the antiphon: “Behold the wood…”  While on one hand the symbol of the Cross itself is hugely significant in Christian art and iconography, the particular subject of this devotional practice since the Early Church is concerned with the Cross as a “tree” (cf. the apostolic preaching in Acts 5:30, 10:39, 13:29, and 1 Peter 2:24, with their various Old Testament types).  Likened to a tree, the Cross can be said to bear fruit (namely, Christ, and the blood and water from his side whence flows our salvation).  Furthermore, and perhaps more fundamentally, this imagery also establishes the Cross as nature’s own participation in the Gospel of our salvation.  Just as the stones would cry out if no one sang Christ’s praise (Luke 19:40), the Cross was Christ’s most faithful companion through his crucifixion.  Meditations such as these arose early in the English Christian imagination, resulting in great poems such as the Old English masterpiece The Dream of the Rood, or “Vision of the Cross.”  The most explicit liturgical expression of this line of devotional insight is found in the hymn endorsed in the rubric on the bottom of BCP page 574, Sing my tongue the glorious battle.  That ancient hymn contains the following stanzas:

Faithful cross! above all other / One and only noble tree!
None in foliage, none in blossom, / None in fruit thy peer may be;
Sweetest wood and sweetest iron!  / Sweetest weight is hung on thee.

Bend thy boughs, O tree of glory! / Thy relaxing sinews bend;
For awhile the ancient rigor / That thy birth bestowed, suspend;
And the King of heavenly beauty / On thy bosom gently tend!

These words, emerging from the biblical-liturgical mindset of the Early Church and written by a 6th-century hymnist, metaphorically call upon the powerful Tree of the Cross to suspend and relax its natural roughness and strength so as to embrace the crucified Lord more gently and lovingly.  Together, Christ and Cross form a faithful duo at the most critical moment of human history.  The arms of the Cross upheld the arms of the Savior interceding for all mankind, like Aaron and Hur upholding the arms of Moses (Exodus 17:12).

The Reproaches

These devotions do something quite rare in Western practice: they form a dialogue between Christ and the congregation.  Few songs and hymns venture to put words into the mouth of God, and devotional writings that do so tend to reveal themselves to be unhinged from biblical fidelity and contrary to Christian orthodoxy (literally, “right worship”).  Through the course of the Church’s history, only the most venerable of mystics have ventured to pen such dialogues with the divine, and even these typically remain best-suited for the monastic context in which they were conceived, generally inaccessible to ordinary Christian piety.  The few dialogues that do stand out in Christian devotion survive because (1) they have stood the test of time through the centuries and (2) they stick closely to the language of Scripture, and these Solemn Reproaches tick both of those boxes.

This devotion contains six stanzas, each with the Trisagion as a responsory refrain.  Each stanza is a set of questions or accusations (hence “reproaches”) from the mouth of Christ, and the Trisagion is our only response, knowing our own guilt.

The first stanza opens with the question that will repeat several times: “what have I done… how have I wearied you?”  This question is drawn from Micah 6:3, and 6:4 contains the first part of God’s testimony (he brought us forth from Egypt).  This, with a reference to the crossing of the Red Sea, is contrasted with sinful humanity’s response of preparing a Cross for him.

The second stanza evokes the account of Exodus 16 and its later reflection in Psalm 105, along with the arrival in the Promised Land, again contrasting this with the crucifixion.

The third stanza draws from the words of Moses and Samuel, prompting us to consider what God has done for us (Deuteronomy 10:21, 1 Samuel 12:24).  The image of God’s people as a vineyard (cf. Isaiah 5 and Ezekiel 19) is contrasted with the vinegar offered back to Christ (cf. Psalm 69:22 and all four Passion narratives).

The fourth stanza contrasts the deliverance of Israel from the tenth plague of Egypt with the deliverance of Jesus over to death (Matthew 20:19, et al), and the “leadership” of the cloudy pillar with Gabbatha (Exodus 13:21-22 and John 19:13).

The fifth stanza turns to pairs of striking down enemies and crowning kings: pitting Psalm 135:10-11 against Matthew 27:30, and Exodus 19:6 against Mark 15:17.

Finally, the Reproaches reach their climax with the images of opening-and-pouring-out and lifting-up-on-high.  Christ provided water from the rock in the wilderness and was himself opened up on the Cross by a spear (Exodus 17 and John 19:34).

In all this, the worshiper is invited to consider God asking “what I have done to you to deserve this?  How have I wearied you?  Testify against (or answer!) me.”  At each accusation or indictment, we are directed to recognize and own our complicity with sin, making no excuses before our Lord, and instead asking in reply only for his mercy.  Although solemn, grave, and deeply penitential, these are no morbid or hopeless pleas.  The Trisagion is not so much a confession of guilt as it is a confession of faith: yes, God is holy, mighty, and immortal, yet it is his property (or character) always to have mercy, and therefore we still have the ability to ask “have mercy upon us.”  If God did not love the sinner and seek out the lost, then such prayers as these would be unwarranted and impossible.

The Anthems

As if in answer to the Reproaches, the antiphons of both of these anthems direct the worshiper back to a posture of praise and adoration.  Even though the death of Christ on the Cross was a horrible evil for which all of mankind shares guilt, that death was also his glory as the Savior, and becomes our glory and joy as we are found in him.

The words of Psalm 67, furthermore, celebrate and pray for the furtherance of God’s mercy among all the nations of the earth, anticipating a future where God receives praise from all peoples.

The second anthem instead takes an expression of praise from a normally-didactic text, providing the Psalm’s Old Testament prophetic perspective with a New Testament clarification: death with Christ yields life with Christ and eternal blessing thereafter.

Distribution of Communion

In line with early, medieval, Roman, and Eastern practice, the full Communion service is not used on Good Friday.  This navigates a tricky dilemma: from the perspective of heightened solemnity, discipline, and self-denial, it is inappropriate for the Church to rehearse the joy-filled prayers that comprise the celebration of Holy Communion; while from the perspective of Holy Friday being Good Friday, the very day on which our Lord performed his saving sacrifice it is eminently appropriate that the Church should partake of the sacrifice of her redemption.  The reservation and redistribution of Holy Communion from a previous service (Palm Sunday in Eastern practice, Maundy Thursday in the West) became the solution to Good Friday’s conundrum.

However, not all Anglican churches are prepared to bear the logistics of consecrating and reserving bread and wine.  Indeed, some reject the practice, as did many of the Anglican divines of the 17th century.  The solution to this issue, therefore, is not to serve Communion at all on Good Friday, as the second rubric describes.

For those following the ancient practice as retrieved in this Prayer Book (as well as the 1979 Book and similar modern worship resources), the Good Friday service continues with the Confession and Absolution of Sin.  Although the two Communion rites allow for their respective prayers of confession to be swapped interchangeably, the default recommendation provided here is the confession of the Anglican Standard Text.  It is longer, more thorough, and more grave in tone, befitting Good Friday more profoundly than its counterpart from the 20th century.  For similar reasons, only the longer bidding to confession is provided beforehand.

No Comfortable Words follow the Absolution.  This, too, is a nod to the solemnity of Good Friday – all elements of joy and comfort are muted in order to keep the worshipers focused on the gravity of their sins, the Cross, and the Passion of Christ our Lord.  The lack of doxology at the end of the Lord’s Prayer accords with the same logic.

Of the two usual Invitations spoken by the celebrant, only one is provided.  Where “the gifts of God for the people of God” may be the more commonly-used, the Invitation taken from John 1:29 is far more appropriate.  That very Lamb of God, or sacrifice made upon the Cross, is now offered to the people to “Behold,” and then to eat and drink.

While music during the distribution of Holy Communion is customary in many places, the spirit of the Good Friday service is such that the distribution is best ministered in silence.  Note that the ministers’ words to the recipients are not provided here – even these standard speeches are silenced!  That said, a hymn or anthem may be selected for this point in the service if great care is taken to choose a song that maintains the solemnity and gravity of the moment, rather than undercutting it with a sudden tonal shift.

To conclude the service, the Post-Communion prayer, blessing, and recessional hymn are neither appointed nor appropriate.  Just as the bulk of the eucharistic prayers were traditionally deemed too celebratory for Good Friday, so are these usual features of the end of the Communion service unadvisable in this rite.  Instead, there is provided a special Concluding Prayer.  It is addressed to Jesus, which is relatively uncommon amongst liturgical prayers.  The primary petition is that he would set the Cross – his suffering and death – in between our sinful souls and his righteous judgment.  This is the Gospel of the Cross in a nutshell!  Christ has interposed his own Passion between the sharp sword of his mouth and our souls which would be pierced by it (Isaiah 49:2, Hebrews 4:12).  We pray for this intervention both “today” (Psalm 95:8, Hebrews 3:7-4:10) and in our hour of death (one’s last chance to make amends before God and men).  Beyond ourselves and individuals, we then pray for all believers: the living, the dead, the Church in her perfection, and us sinners in our need.

The direction to depart in silence signifies that the liturgy is not truly concluded, but is once again only pausing, waiting to continue on the next day.  As on Maundy Thursday, people may be tacitly invited to remain for silent prayer and devotion.  And, as the introductory text noted, other public devotions may soon follow, such as Stations of the Cross or the Seven Last Words.  Whatever the specific schedule of events, the unfinished feeling of this service should point people to the liturgical reality that the story is not over yet: ahead remains yet Christ’s burial and repose in the tomb, and only after that the vigil of his resurrection.

An Overview of Maundy Thursday

One of the major changes to the Prayer Book tradition in the 20th century, culminating in the American Prayer Book of 1979, is the restoration of unique Triduum services to mark the end of Holy Week and Lent.  Maundy Thursday, Good Friday, and Holy Saturday form a triduum or “trilogy of days” which together form a coherent whole, seamlessly uniting biblical narrative, public piety, and theological instruction.  The introductory text states that the services of these three days (leading to the Great Vigil of Easter) “form a single liturgy.”  This accounts for the lack of blessings and dismissals at the end of all but the last of these services, the lack of celebration of Holy Communion on Friday and Saturday, awkward periods of silence, and several other features that may seem quirky in isolation.  As a whole, the Triduum services form an epic experience of worship and devotion filled to the brim with doctrinal instruction and biblical immersion, but this is also their weakness.  For those who attend only one of the three days, the full context is missed, and the liturgy, literally the “public work”, is not able to work to its full potential upon such an individual’s heart and mind.  To address this issue, the classical Prayer Book tradition offers us some alternatives which shall be considered through the following service commentaries.

The name “Maundy Thursday,” as explained here, comes from the traditional evening celebration which focused on our Lord’s washing of the disciples’ feet.

The Acclamation and Sentences

The service may begin with a processional hymn like a normal eucharistic celebration but the opening rubric encourages the option of silence.  As in the Ash Wednesday and Palm Sunday services, silence will continue to be one of the most powerful tools in this and the following two rites.

The four Opening Sentences together form a brief Address in which the celebrant introduces the biblical chronology of this evening’s commemoration.  Each sentence names Jesus by a different title relevant to his subsequent works: “Christ the Son of Man” gathers with his disciples; “Christ our Lord and Master” became a lowly foot-washing servant; “Christ our God” inaugurated the Sacrament of Holy Communion out the Passover meal; “Christ the Lamb of God” gave himself up for his own execution.  Depending upon the extent of the enactment of the liturgy, all four of these may be observed in the service to follow.

The Lessons

The beginning of Exodus 12 describes the Passover meal which provides the Old Testament context for the Last Supper.

Psalm 78:15-26 celebrates the manna that God provided in the desert during the Exodus years.  This “food from heaven” and “bread of angels” provides another significant Old Testament context for the eucharistic feast that Christ inaugurates.

The Epistle contains what is actually the first recorded account of the Last Supper, as 1 Corinthians was likely written in the year 53 or 54 during Saint Paul’s ministry and the Gospels weren’t written until the 60’s or 70’s, toward the end of the Apostles’ lives.  The final portion of the reading is labeled as optional, but historically it was always included.  The warning in those verses against profaning the body and blood of Christ is expounded in the Exhortation to Holy Communion; the only feasible reason to omit reading these verses here is if the Exhortation is going to be said later in this service.

As for the Gospels, John 13 has the most historical precedent as being the standard Gospel for this service for a thousand years until the Reformation.  The reading from Luke 22 allows the preacher to bring two different narratives of the Last Supper together before the congregation’s attention, making it a good choice if that biblical narrative is to be the focus of the sermon.  Otherwise, the Foot-Washing Gospel should take pride of place in this service.

The Foot-Washing

After the sermon, the Celebrant introduces the worshipers to the next unique feature of this worship service.  The Address provided here explains the mentality behind Jesus’ example: Christian strength and growth comes from humility, or “lowly service.”  The washing of others’ feet was the epitome of lowly service in the Middle East in the first century, so for our Lord and God to undertake such a role infuses Christianity with a distinct conception of authority and service which has thoroughly permeated ever Christian (and post-Christian!) culture ever since.

Traditionally, the washing of the feet is carried out by the rector or vicar and received by members of the vestry or other representatives of the congregation.  However, this is not specified in the rubrics either in the 1979 Prayer Book or in this.  Thus it has become the custom of some that not only do the clergy wash others’ feet, but anyone in the congregation may wash the feet of others.  This presents some difficult questions.  On one hand this innovation rightly grasps and applies the final command of Christ in the Gospel: “you also ought to wash one another’s feet.”  All Christians are called to lives of humility, serving one another no matter how lofty or lowly the job.  On the other hand, Jesus gave this instruction to his disciples, not to his larger crowd of followers, and the imagery of lowly service is predicated on the fact that the one who humbles himself before others is indeed of a higher rank than them.  Thus the foot-washing command is incumbent upon pastors washing the feet of their flock, and for everyone to wash one another’s feet is to miss the profundity of the leader kneeling before the follower.

During the foot-washing, it is customary for the choir to sing an anthem special to the occasion.  Similar to the Offertory and (at least in the 1549 Prayer Book) the Communion, scripture verses are offered as anthems alongside the reality of other traditional songs being known and available.

The Communion and Beyond

After this, the Communion service continues with the Prayers of the People and proceeds normally until the Post-Communion Prayer.  At that point (1) the Reserved Sacrament may be processed to the Altar of Repose, then (2) the Altar may be stripped, to the reading or chanting of Psalm 22, and then (3) the service ends without dismissal and the people either depart in silence or remain for prayer and vigil before the Altar of Repose, liturgically joining Christ in Gethsemane to keep watch (for at least) one hour.

The reason for this silence is twofold.  First, it is part of the liturgical drama of re-living our Lord’s last night and day before his death; by departing in silence the worshiper is not only put in mind of the disciples’ unceremonious scattering from Jesus upon his arrest, but also experiences something of that discomfort in a visceral manner.  The second reason is that the modern (or renewed medieval) Triduum services are conceived of as a continuous whole:

  1. Holy Communion commemorating the Foot-Washing and the Last Supper
  2. The Reservation of the Blessed Sacrament
  3. The Stripping of the Altar
  4. The Watches, or Night Vigil, perhaps concluding with Tenebrae
  5. The Passion and Solemn Collects of Good Friday
  6. Devotions before (or Stations of) the Cross
  7. Distribution of Communion (or Mass of the Presanctified)
  8. The Holy Saturday Service with Burial Anthem
  9. The Great Vigil of Easter, consisting of: The Liturgy of Light and Exsultet, The Vigil of Lessons, Holy Baptism, and the First Mass of Easter

And, of course, punctuating all these are the Daily Offices of Morning and Evening Prayer.  Thus the 2019 Prayer Book endorses:

  1. Thursday Evening Prayer
  2. The Maundy Thursday Service
  3. Thursday Compline
  4. Tenebrae*
  5. Friday Morning Prayer
  6. Way (or Stations) of the Cross*
  7. The Good Friday Service
  8. The Seven Last Words of Christ*
  9. Friday Evening Prayer
  10. Friday Compline
  11. Saturday Morning Prayer
  12.  The Holy Saturday Service
  13. Saturday Evening Prayer
  14. The Great Vigil of Easter

* These services are endorsed on BCP page 564, but forms for their observance are not provided in the Prayer Book itself.

What is a Penitential Season?

In our religious discourse and in our Prayer Book we often describe Lent as a “Penitential season”. Advent is often described this way too, though some like to argue that it is not, or is less penitential than Lent. In any case, what I want to explore today is “what is a penitential season?”

Penitence is a posture and set of acts that express sorrow for sin, doing penance, pursuing holiness and healing in the wake of repentance from wrongdoing. A penitential season, therefore, is a period of time in which someone (or more usually the whole church) engages in this with a defined beginning and end.

What easily gets lost in the mix is that, if we are (or if one is) to have a set time of penitence, there must first be a time of self-examination culminating in a confession or act of contrition or resolution to make amends. After all, there’s little use in expressing sorrow for sin one hasn’t yet identified, in doing penance without being assigned any by a confessor, in pursuing healing before the medicine has been prescribed. In short: a “Penitential Season” needs a “Self-Examination Season” to come first, otherwise the penitential season is just glorified gloominess.

Too often, this is how we approach Lent. We come into the season and remember “oh yes, this is the time to think extra hard about my sins and what I can give up and how to be a better Christian and grow closer to Jesus. And I guess I’m not supposed to Alleluia in the worship service for six weeks because I’m supposed to be sad in church or something.” This jumble, while well-intentioned and technically correct, does not reflect wise preparation and lacks the insight and aid of church tradition.

In the old calendar, before the 1970’s, the season of Lent was preceded by three Sundays, called “Pre-Lent” or the “Gesima Sundays” after their Latin names: Septuagesima, Sexagesima, and Quinquagesima. However we name or label them, the themes of the readings through these days pointed the congregation toward questions of self-reflection and examination. The traditional practice was that by the end of this period everyone would make their confession to the priest (typically on Shrove Tuesday) so that on the next day (Ash Wednesday) everyone would be ready to worship the Lord in a unified act of penitence, and enter into the season of Lent with an actual plan or intention for increased spiritual discipline.

The modern calendar has, sadly, done away with this valuable period of reflection, and many preachers who serve in churches that do retain the Pre-Lent Sundays don’t always take proper advantage of those weeks to prepare people for their Lenten observance.

However, the attentive preacher can still find fodder for preparing people for Lent in the modern calendar and lectionary. In Year A of the three-year cycle the Gospel lessons through the season of Epiphany walk through portions of the Sermon on the Mount (mostly from Matthew 5). Our Lord’s teachings on holiness in these passages provide excellent material for self-examination in the final weeks before the season of Lent begins. That is what I strove to do in the past three weeks before writing this. In Year B the readings offer fewer obvious aids to this theme, but it must be noted that on the 6th Sunday of Epiphany the epistle lesson is 1 Corinthians 9:24-27 which happens to be the traditional Epistle for the first of the three Pre-Lent Sundays! In Year C, if the Epiphany season is long enough, its Gospel readings also reach Luke’s version of the Sermon on the Mount in chapter 6. And those are just the obvious lectionary opportunities; an attentive preacher will be able to prepare the congregation for Lent appropriately with nearly any biblical text at hand.

The Prayer of a new Rector / Minister

Having been invested with the symbols of the office of Rector (or whatever other ministry position is being celebrated with this rite), the minister now turns to prayer.  It is a rare example of a long-form 18th-century prayer in a modern Prayer Book where brevity typically wins the day.

The Address

1789 through 19281979 & 2019
O Lord my God! I am not worthy that thou shouldest come under my roof;
yet thou hast honoured thy servant with appointing him to stand in thy House, and to serve at thy holy Altar.
O Lord my God, I am not worthy to have you come under my roof;
yet you have called your servant to stand in your house, and to serve at your altar.
To thee and to thy service I devote myself,
mind, body, and spirit, with all their powers and faculties.
To you and to your service I devote myself, body, soul, and spirit.

It begins with a sort of prayer of humble access referencing Matthew 8:8 / Luke 7:6, artistically contrasting the minister’s unworthiness to have God enter his or her own (earthly) house with God’s invitation to us to stand in his (heavenly) house.  This is paired with the service at the altar, as the default use of this rite is for the installation of a Rector.  If this rite is celebrating the beginning of a different sort of ministry, this prayer either should be omitted or substantially rewritten.  Furthermore, the reference to the “altar” instead of the “holy table” is unusual in classical Prayer Book language.  But, noting that this is an 18th-century composition, we rest assured that this was written a generation before the controversies of the Oxford Movement, thereby demonstrating that the terminology of an Altar is compatible with Anglican tradition and doctrine, in parallel to the terminology of “holy table”.

Unlike most prayers written before the 20th century and changed into modern idiom, the opening of this prayer retains the 3rd person self-reference – a feature that adorned most of the prayer Book collects (“O God, who has…”) that have been grammatically transformed (“O God, you have…”).  Nevertheless, some of the exalted phraseology has been trimmed: “honored… with appointing him” has been reduced to “called”, God’s house and altar now stand in parallel without the latter being described as “holy”, and all the “powers and faculties” of the human person are left unmentioned.  The tripartite description of the human person (in Greek, sarks, psyche, pneuma) is also reordered, and psyche is now rendered as “soul” instead of “mind”.

The First Petition

The prayer continues with an oblation (“To you and your service I devote…”), and petitions to fulfill that oblation (“Fill my memory… enlighten”).  In order to be fully devoted to God and his service, the minister needs to have a mind filled with the divine truth of Sacred Scripture, with a full understanding and a conformed heart and will.  All Christians are called be submitted to the Lord Jesus and his written word, the Bible, so the ministers of the Gospel are called to a heightened form of such submission.

1789 through 19281979 & 2019
Fill my memory with the words of thy Law; enlighten my understanding with the illumination of the Holy Ghost; and may all the wishes and desires of my will centre in what thou hast commanded.Fill my memory with the record of your mighty works; enlighten my understanding with the light of your Holy Spirit; and may all the desires of my heart and will center in what you have me do.

The first petition is substantially the same in both old & new versions: that God would fill the minister’s memory with the Scriptures, providing enlightenment to the understanding and centering for the heart and will.  The reference to the Scriptures has changed from “Law” to “record of your mighty works”. This reflects changes in English language and terminology: “law” used to denote a more general sense of order, or the way things work, compared to the more rules-specific use of the word over the course of the 20th century.  By referring to the Bible as the record of God’s mighty works instead, it re-expands our focus from only the propositional teachings, or the Books of the Law of Moses, to include the whole gamut of scriptural revelation.

The Second Petition

Next, this prayer addresses the relationship between the minister (specifically a priest) and the congregation.  Matching the language of the Articles of Religion, especially XXVII, the priest is likened to an “instrument” of God’s salvation.  Although abhorrent to the broader evangelical world as it stands today, this sacramental language of the ministry is fully Catholic, classically Protestant, and properly Anglican.  As this prayer goes on to describe, the priest must faithfully preach the Gospel and administer God’s holy Sacraments, and set forth God’s Word “by my life and teaching”.  Although Anglican doctrine does not commit to referring to Holy Orders as a Sacrament on an equal level as Baptism and Holy Communion, it is “commonly called” a sacrament (Article XXV), and this prayer (along with the Ordinal) describes how the ministry of Word and Sacrament is embodied in the ordained ministry.  The nature of Holy Orders therefore is what some today would term “a salvation issue”, as the priest is an instrument of God’s salvation for the immediate congregation.

1789 through 192819792019
And, to make me instrumental in promoting the salvation of the people now committed to my charge, grant that I may faithfully administer thy holy Sacraments, and by my life and doctrine set forth thy true and lively Word.Make me an instrument of your salvation for the people entrusted to my care, and grant that I may faithfully administer your holy sacraments, and by my life and teaching set forth your true and living Word.Make me an instrument of your salvation for the people entrusted to my care, and grant that I may faithfully preach the Gospel and administer your holy Sacraments, and by my life and teaching set forth your true and living Word.

The largest change to this prayer is found in the second petition.  Originally, the minister prays to be made “instrumental in promoting the salvation of the people”, but in 1979 this switched to “make me an instrument of your salvation.”  This subtle shift may be considered to be a red flag of sacerdotalism: the priest becoming a vehicle of dispensing God’s grace, rather than an instrumental promotor of God’s grace.  Although the change of language and meaning in this prayer from 1928 to 1979 is real, it does not represent a substantial change in the Anglican doctrine of Holy Orders; the text of the Ordinal has always retained the language of the priest forgiving and remitting the sins of the people, which is very much an instrumental role in the dispensing of God’s grace.  Furthermore, the rest of the petition provides clarification as to the minister’s role – both as an instrumental promoter and as an instrument of God’s grace.  Faithful administration of the Sacraments and the setting forth of God’s Word through one’s life and teaching are named as the means of the minister’s instrumentality in the salvation of God’s people.  The addition of “that I may faithfully preach the Gospel” in the present book introduces a redundancy with the final phrase which is slightly awkward, but it does serve to broaden the meaning of the instrumentality of the priest if the 1979 text went a little too far.

The Third Petition and Doxology

With this terrible responsibility in mind, the Rector then prays for God’s help: prayer with “quickened” (that is, enlivened) devotion, higher love and thankfulness with which to praise God, readiness of thought and expression in preaching, and zeal for godly preparation for times and offices of worship.  In short, the priest’s entire life needs to be transformed by the Holy Spirit in order for the ministry to be carried out.  The petition concludes with a mission-oriented prayer: that the message of the Bible may be presented so clearly and brightly that “all the world may be drawn” into the Church.  Obviously this is beyond the scope of any individual priest’s ministry, and thus sets it (and every individual church and ministry) within the context of the Church Catholic – the whole blessed Kingdom of God whose work in this world is inexorable and inevitable.

1789 through 192819792019
Be ever with me in the performance of all the duties of my ministry; in prayer, to quicken my devotion; in praises, to heighten my love and gratitude; and in preaching, to give a readiness of thought and expression suitable to the clearness and excellency of thy holy Word.Be always with me in carrying out the duties of my ministry. In prayer, quicken my devotion; in praises, heighten my love and gratitude; in preaching, give me readiness of thought and expression; and grant that, by the clearness and brightness of your holy Word, all the world may be drawn into your blessed kingdom.Be always with me in carrying out the duties of my ministry. In prayer, quicken my devotion; in praises, heighten my love and gratitude; in preaching, give me readiness of thought and expression; in worship, increase my zeal for godly preparation; and grant that, by the clearness and brightness of your holy Word, all the world may be drawn into your blessed kingdom.
Grant this for the sake of Jesus Christ thy Son our Saviour.All this I ask for the sake of your Son our Savior Jesus Christ.

The third and final petition is largely the same as its original form, differing primarily in the details of its expression rather than its substantial meaning.  The grammar, too, has been restructured, favoring shorter sentences over the older constructions which strung together several phrases into one sentence.

The most notable change is the addition of the “in worship…” phrase.  Classically, the overlap between prayer, praise, and worship has been so great that to list them separately would be redundant and artificial.  Having added “worship” alongside “prayer” and “praises”, the 2019 Prayer Book may be suggesting more particular definitions of all three than would be historically recognizable.

The final phrase concerning the clearness and brightness of your holy Word was originally part of the minister’s prayer for his preaching.  It was first separated in 1979, attached instead to a missiological prayer where it remains today.

Lastly, this is not for the glory of the priest, or of the priesthood, or of the church, but for the sake of Jesus.  His name only is worth proclaiming through all of this.

The Bishop: What he is and isn’t

It’s no secret that the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA) is going through the wringer right now. We’ve got two bishops under disciplinary investigation or trial, one special diocesan jurisdiction that just got ripped apart in an authority crisis between multiple bishops, and controversy over how each of these cases is being handled. Even some bishops and administrators not currently under scrutiny are being called into question over their alleged or apparent complicity with how various issues and cases have been mishandled in the past. There is a lot of heartache, a lot of broken trust, and a lot of confusion.

Archbishop Wood celebrating Eucharist at his installation as Archbishop, 2024

Fixing this will take more than slapping a canonical revision to Title IV onto the Province; it will take vulnerability and transparency; hard questions must be asked and hard answered given; liars must confess; sinners must repent; the disobedient must conform and the leaders must lead rightly.

yeah I made a meme

Apologia

I’m just a parish priest with a writing habit, sitting in a quiet spot in New England, safely distanced from pretty much everyone involved in provincial matters. I have no personal stakes for or against Archbishop Wood or any of the other men filling in for him in their various capacities, and I have no insider knowledge concerning who’s done what sins and who’s covering up what secrets. So I am very far from being able to offer any solutions; my place largely is to pray for them from my safe distance and strive to live up to the expectations placed upon me and the vows that I have taken as a priest in God’s Church.

As a writer, though, and specifically as a commentator on the Prayer Book that binds us together, I do have some observations on the nature of the episcopacy and how different understandings of that great office may be coming into play in the present crises.

The Bishop’s Vows

As with deacons and priests, one of the best ways to understand the ministry and identity of a bishop is to look at the questions posed to a bishop-elect at his ordination / consecration service. The Examination questions are answered by vows: the clergyman makes promises to his superior(s) that he will live accordingly. So let’s take a look at what the Bishop vows at his consecration.

  1. Are you persuaded that you are truly called to this ministry, according to the will of our Lord Jesus Christ and the Order of this Church? I am so persuaded.
  2. Do you believe that the Holy Scriptures contain all things necessary for salvation through faith in Jesus Christ? And are you determined out of the Holy Scriptures to instruct the people committed to your charge, and to teach or maintain nothing as necessary to eternal salvation but that which may be concluded and proved by the Scriptures? I do so believe, and I am so determined, the Lord being my helper.
  3. Will you then faithfully study the Holy Scriptures, and call upon God by prayer for the true understanding of them, so that you may be able by them to teach and exhort with wholesome doctrine, and to withstand and convince those who contradict it? I will, the Lord being my helper.
  4. Are you ready, with all faithful diligence, to banish and drive away from the Church all erroneous and strange doctrine contrary to God’s Word, and both privately and publicly to call upon others and encourage them to do the same? I am ready, the Lord being my helper.
  5. Will you renounce all ungodliness and worldly lusts, and live a godly, righteous, and sober life in this present world, that you may show yourself in all things an example of good works for others, that the adversary may be ashamed, having nothing to say against you? I will, the Lord being my helper.
  6. Will you maintain and set forward, as much as you are able, quietness, love, and peace among all people, and diligently exercise such discipline as is, by the authority of God’s Word and by the Order of this Church, committed to you?  I will, the Lord being my helper.
  7. Will you be faithful in examining, confirming, ordaining, and sending the people of God? I will, the Lord being my helper.
  8. Will you show yourself gentle, and be merciful for Christ’s sake, to poor and needy people and to all strangers destitute of help? I will, the Lord being my helper.

These are, naturally, very similar to the questions posed to deacons and priests, but there are some important differences too. The 5th question, for example, is markedly more severe than what is asked of other clergymen. Renouncing “all ungodliness and worldly lusts… that the adversary may be ashamed, having nothing to say against you” is more than we ask of our priests and deacons. And this reflects the teaching 1 Timothy 3:7, which says an overseer, or bishop, “must be well thought of by outsiders, so that he may not fall into disgrace, into a snare of the devil.” Note this is not just about holiness of life, but also of reputation! This suggests that even if a man is innocent but has a tarnished reputation, we should think twice before putting a miter on him and calling him Bishop.

my diocesan bishop, Andrew Williams, standing before Archbishop Beach upon his consecration, 2019

A Context of Recent Historical Confusion

Although these eight vows are the same historic questions and answers put to Anglican bishops since 1662 (and since 1549 with the exception of #7), there is one influential Prayer Book that broke from this pattern: the Episcopalian Prayer Book of 1979. And since that book was the most widely-used among American Anglicans for forty years before the ACNA’s Prayer Book was published, it is worth wrestling with the questions it asked of bishops. Here’s a comparison of the historic Anglican vows against the 1979 rewrite, lined up for comparison by subject matter:

15491662 through 19281979
1. “Are you persuaded that you be truly called…?”1. “Are you persuaded that God has called you to the office of bishop?”
2. “Will you accept this call and fulfill this trust in obedience to Christ?”
2. “Are you persuaded that the holy Scriptures contain sufficiently all doctrine required…?”3. “Will you be faithful in prayer, and in the study of Holy Scripture, that you may have the mind of Christ?”
4. “Will you boldly proclaim and interpret the Gospel of Christ, enlightening the minds and stirring up the conscience of your people?”
3. “Will you then faithfully exercise yourself in the said holy Scriptures…?”5. “As a chief priest and pastor, will you encourage and support all baptized people in their gifts and ministries, nourish them from the riches of God’s grace, pray for them without ceasing, and celebrate with them the sacraments of our redemption?”
4. “Be you ready, with all faithful diligence, to banish and drive away…?”6. “Will you guard the faith, unity and discipline of the Church?”
7. “Will you share with your fellow bishops in the government of the whole Church; will you sustain your fellow presbyters [priests] and take counsel with them; will you guide and strengthen the deacons and all others who minister in the Church?”
5. “Will you deny all ungodliness, and worldly lusts…?” 
6. “Will you maintain and set forward (as much as shall lie in you) quietness, peace, and love among all…?” 
 7. “Will you be faithful in ordaining, sending, or laying hands upon others?” 
7. “Will you shew yourself gentle, and be merciful for Christ’s sake, to poor and needy people…?”8. “Will you shew yourself gentle, and be merciful for Christ’s sake, to poor and needy people…?”8. “Will you be merciful to all, show compassion to the poor and strangers, and defend those who have no helper?”

It is worth noting that the departure in 1979 from the historic examination indicates a view of the episcopacy that is considerably more authoritarian and clericalist than what is found in the historic Anglican tradition:

  • there are two questions on his calling instead of one,
  • it spells out his sharing in collegial episcopal authority,
  • it gives him the responsibility of “interpreting the Gospel to” and supporting all baptized people as “chief priest and pastor”.

All this makes the Bishop considerably more involved in various avenues of ministry. 

A word for our leaders today

If we are to receive correctives from the classical tradition, which is restored and taught in our 2019 Prayer Book, we are inevitably pointed to a different picture. Instead of a busy bureaucratic micromanager, the Anglican Bishop is to be a man of God who renounces ungodly and worldly lusts more clearly and publicly than the priest is ever asked to do; the Bishop is to be faithful to carry out the episcopal ministry of examining, confirming, and ordaining his people; he is to be an apt teacher of the Word.

We don’t have to spend two questions dwelling on his sense of calling; his vocation has been made clear through the lengthy process of diocesan searching and examination and confirmed by the approval of the College of Bishops.

We don’t have to remind bishops that they are “chief priests and pastors” who need to sustain their priests and support their deacons; they are to be “faithful in ordaining, sending, or laying hands upon others” and be capable teachers of God’s Word for them and diligent exercisers of godly discipline.

At least one small part of our present troubles taking place at the provincial level of the ACNA can be accounted for due to these 1979-style conceptions of the episcopacy carrying over into a system that charitably assumes classically-Anglican bishops. The Bishop’s chief posture is not to be huddled up “with your fellow bishops in the government of the whole Church”, but instead to be ministering God’s Word to his people. I have seen a couple different articles popping up in recent weeks arguing for a reform of ACNA governing polity that takes the College of Bishops down a notch. At first I was indifferent to the idea, but having reviewed the Ordinal as I have presented it above I now see the wisdom in those proposals. Bishops are not meant to be bureaucrats, governors, or senators leading from an office building; the College of Bishops is not meant to be a College of Cardinals meeting in secret. The Anglican ideal, rather, is choosing a Bishop who evidently lives a holy life and has a reliable gift of teaching. If he doesn’t have great administration skills, that’s fine; that’s what the synods, canons to the ordinary, and other assemblies are for.

I don’t write this to condemn any Bishop or leader in particular – like I said before, I don’t know any of the provincial leaders personally. I write this to warn against false perceptions of the episcopacy that have permeated (and perhaps poisoned!) our Church. We mustn’t look to the clericalist authoritarianism of Rome; we mustn’t look to the business-success models of the megachurch movement; we mustn’t look to the cults of personality that surround many men of charisma. Rather, as Anglicans, we should be looking among our priests for the quiet, meek, holy, and faithful teachers whose lives and words proclaim the Gospel with equal measure and integrity.

This is, by the way, why many of our greatest bishops and archbishops throughout history were monks – not because of the early-medieval favoritism often given to the monastic life, but because that is where the men most devoted to a holy life and the Word of God were most often found. Many of the great leaders of the Church had no episcopal aspirations whatsoever – John Chrysostom, Augustine of Hippo, Anselm, and many others much preferred the monk’s habit to the episcopal miter. If we are to rebuild a healthy provincial leadership paradigm, these are the sorts of men we need to be seeking, electing, and consecrating as our diocesan bishops.

No more bureaucrats and mega-pastors! Give me that old time religion! Give me a man who is above reproach, the husband of one wife, sober-minded, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not a drunkard, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money. These are the bishops whose discipline and authority will not only be respected by their flocks, but loved.

Michaelmas throughout the Scriptures

September 29th is the feast of Holy Michael the Archangel, and most calendars today extend this feast to the celebration of All Angels alongside him. As I’ve done a few times before here, I’d like to reverse-engineer this holy day by walking through several texts of Scripture that have been used over the years to celebrate this great feast.

Prologue: Daniel 10 & Revelation 5

We begin with a pair of great visions, one by the Prophet Daniel and one by Saint John. Daniel ch. 10 is the vision in which an angel comes to speak to Daniel, and he is terrified, as is the usual response to angel visitations. But the angel strengthens him with a touch on the mouth and words of his own, particularly mentioning two different times that the Archangel Michael helped him fight against the “prince of” (read: demon behind) Persia so that he could get to Daniel to deliver this message. Michael is further described as “your prince”, that is, a guardian angel in defense of all God’s people. In Christian religious language, that’d be rendered as Michael being the Patron of the Church. This is of great comfort to Daniel, and it should also be of great comfort to us – that we have such a terrifyingly powerful being fighting on our behalf against the spiritual powers behind or within this dark world of sin.

The vision in Revelation 5 takes this even further up the heavenly ladder: there is a scroll that nobody in heaven seems worthy to open: not even these mighty angels! But there is one who is worthy: the seven-horned lamb standing on a throne as if slain. That’s a terrifying appearance too, perhaps even more than the angel who visited Daniel. Yet we know that this lamb is actually a depiction of the Lord Jesus, who is exalted above all heavenly beings, being God himself. So we enter into this holy day celebrating the angelic hosts and their great Captain, Michael, with a reminder both of their mighty power and of their Lord and ours: Jesus the Son of God.

In the Morning: Psalm 82, Daniel 12, and Revelation 8

Us modern and post-modern folks have a frequently-recurring problem with the supernatural. We tend either toward denial or dualism: denial being that atheistic or de-mythologizing tendency to ignore the existence of spiritual things (or at least downplay their reality), and dualism being the attitude that matter and spirit are utterly separate, and the human soul’s ultimate goal is to escape this mortal flesh and become pure spirit like God. This Psalm and these two lessons smash these false teachings to bits like they’re nothing, and rightly so!

In Psalm 82 God addresses “you princes” and “you gods”. From other examples of Old Testament language (like Daniel 10, above), a prince can refer not only to a powerful human ruler but also to a powerful spirit – a high-ranking angel or a demon. As God sits in judgment in and over the council of princes we hear his calling to defend the poor, deliver the outcast, save the weak from the hand of the ungodly. He acknowledges that these “princes” are “gods” but that they shall die like mortals. Whether it’s an angel or a human, both alike stand before God as subjects. All nations – earthly and heavenly – shall be taken by God as his own inheritance.

This is further promised in Daniel 12, where the angel tells Daniel that Michael the Archangel will arise and commence a great deliverance of God’s people in their time of greatest need. Daniel doesn’t fully understand, but is assured that God has a timetable, the days of suffering are numbered (not endless), and that Daniel himself will have his place to stand (that is, to be vindicated in judgment) on the Last Day.

Revelation 8 also depicts that time of judgement: the Lamb has opened the last seal of the scroll mentioned earlier (in chapter 5, above) and this unleashes a round of judgment upon the earth. And, just like how Psalm 82 blurs the distinction between angelic princes and human princes, Revelation 8 details the offering of the “prayers of the saints” as incense from the hand of an angel: in short, heavenly worship and earthly worship, angelic worship and human worship, is all one, intertwined and inseparable. Thus when we celebrate Holy Michael and All Angels, we do celebrate an order of beings that is quite distinct from us, yet we do so acknowledging that they are also a sort of kin to us; we are one with the angels in service to Christ!

At the modern Eucharist:
Genesis 28:10-17, Psalm 103, Revelation 12:7-12, and John 1:47-51

At the principle worship service of the day, we hear a smattering of texts that further depict this link between earth and heaven. Genesis 28 contains the story of Jacob’s Ladder, in which that ancient patriarch has a dream and sees angels climbing up and down a ladder between heaven and earth. This has forever since served as one of the primary images of the Christian life: aided upwards by angels and discouraged downwards by demons, we are ascending from one world to another. The reading from John 1 is the main New Testament acknowledgement of this image: Jesus tells Nathaniel (Bartholomew) that he will see angels ascending and descending upon the Son of Man. Thus Jesus makes himself out to be Jacob’s Ladder, the very Way to heaven!

Psalm 103 contributes a separate word of connection between earth and heaven. In the same vein as Revelation 8 (above) we here call upon the angels and heavenly hosts to bless the Lord along with us.

And in Revelation 12 we read of the epic battle between Michael (the Archangel) and the dragon (Satan), which represents a cosmic or supernatural or spiritual perspective of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Whether you look at “the war in heaven” or at the Cross of Christ, you see the same result: “Now the salvation and the power and the kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ have come“.

At a traditional Eucharist: Isaiah 14:12-17, Psalm 148:1-3, Matthew 18:1-10

Instead of (or in addition to) those readings, a traditional eucharistic service might also present us with readings such as these.

Isaiah 14 contains the great contrast to Holy Michael by addressing the dragon, his opponent, the false “Day Star”, Satan. This was once a great and holy being but he chose to “ascend to heaven above the stars of God” without climbing the ladder that is Christ. He sought to make himself “like the Most High” but instead is brought down to Sheol, the place of the dead.

Psalm 148 begins like Psalm 103 ends: with a call to the angels to praise the Lord alongside us and all creation. Again, this emphasizes the unity of heaven and earth, of angel and human, giving us a common identity and calling in the unending worship of God.

And Matthew 18, finally, returns us to the concept of a guardian angel (cf. Daniel 10, above). Here, Jesus warns us not cause “little ones” (that is, children either in age or in spiritual maturity) to sin, for “their angels always see the face of my Father who is in heaven.” In other words, there are angelic beings watching over the weak, and if we mistreat or mislead them, we shall be held accountable. Thus the angels remain very much attentive to human affairs.

In the Evening: Genesis 32 & Acts 12:1-11

The celebration of this holy day wraps up with two last images: Jacob’s wrestling with the Angel of the Lord, and Peter’s angelic breakout from prison. In the former case, the “Angel of the Lord” is so closely associated with God himself that this angel is often understood to be Jesus, before he was incarnate (or made man). This is evidenced in the Angel’s refusal to tell Jacob his name (as a couple other angels were happy to disclose their names to people); for the holy name of Jesus was not yet given. Meanwhile in Acts 12, an angel breaks St. Peter out of prison and leads him to safety.

In both of these cases, the spiritual realms are interposed upon the material world, the heavenly invades the earthly. The Angel of the Lord comes to strengthen and bless Jacob in his night of anguish and fear, and an angel comes to rescue Peter from a possible death sentence before his time. After all those cosmic, large-scale pictures of the union of heaven of earth and the cooperation of angels and men, it helps to conclude with these two, more personal stories. For it sends us away from this holiday thinking not just about the grand idea of angels, but also of specific tangible personal examples of angelic assistance. It’s one thing to say “Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for thereby some have entertained angels unawares” (Hebrews 13:2), but it’s all the more real to us when we are reminded of these one-on-one encounters.

May Holy Michael and the angelic hosts of the Lord Jesus be not only an inspiration to you, but a true and powerful help in times of trouble.

The Prayers of the People hit differently when relocated…

Lately I’ve been looking at different orders of service found in different Prayer Books and contemplating (with help from others) the significance of some of the different configurations that are out there. Some changes can be pretty subtle, like how the Prayer of Humble Access has hopped around a few times in the past 500 years. Other variations are a bit more substantial, though, and that’s where the Prayers of the People come into the discussion.

Over the centuries there are three places where they might be located: in the Eucharist Canon, in the Offertory, and in the Liturgy of the Word. Let’s check ’em out.

DISCLAIMER: The term “prayers of the people” is only a feature of modern Prayer Books, and in classical Prayer Book use it’s typically called the “prayer for the whole state of Christ’s Church [and the world]”. Because they are textually equivalent, I’m just going to use the modern title throughout this article. We’ll explore why it makes sense in some cases more than others.

Location #1: Sacrificial Prayers

The 1549 Prayer Book looks like a real oddball in the collection of Anglican Prayer Books. As essentially the first draft, it contains a number of features that promptly vanished, and the location of the Prayers of the People is one of those things. There, the Sursum Corda (“lift up your hearts”) is relatively early in the liturgy, and right after the Sanctus (Holy, Holy Holy) the priest or deacon turns to the people and says “Let us pray for the whole state of Christ’s Church.” And after the familiar ending of that prayer, “Grant this, O Father, for Jesus Christ’s sake…” he continues immediately with the Prayers of Consecration. No other Prayer Book since has done this, making it feel a rather strange option.

What I recently rediscovered, however, is that this is largely how it worked before the Reformation. In a 1526 version of the Sarum Missal, the Sanctus was followed by a few prayers of intercession, akin to what Catholics today might call “mass intentions.” Indeed, the Sarum prayers were lengthened by Cranmer for the first Prayer Book, perhaps setting the stage for a need to move them elsewhere in the service. In any case, the location of the intercessions here, literally at the altar, spoken by the priest, ad orientem (that is, facing the altar, same as the people), makes the character of these prayers particularly sacrificial. These intercessions are part of the Church’s regular sacrifice of prayer as we fulfill our priestly function in praying for one another and the world around us.

Location #2: Offering Prayers

Prayer Book revision quickly shifted the prayers for the whole state away from the eucharistic canon and landed them in the Offertory, where they remained until the mid-20th century revisions kicked in. This diminishes the sacrificial emphasis of the prayers and moves them more into the realm of the people’s offering. Indeed, this prayer even mentioned “our alms and oblations”, explicitly uniting the offering of our money and ourselves with the offering of our prayers. Thus the intercessions became less of a priest’s intentions at the altar and more of the concerns of a congregation, even though the actual text remained the same. At this point “Prayers of the People” starts to make sense, even though the reader of the prayer was still the priest, and the congregation was still referred to as “they” instead of the modern “we.”

Location #3: The People’s Prayers

In the mid-20th century, in the wake of Rome’s second Vatican Council, a huge movement of liturgical revision and renewal was underway, and no tradition was left unscathed. This novus ordo (literally, new order) rearranged much of the liturgy, and for the Prayers of the People this mean that they were now prayed after the Creed instead of after the Offertory. What’s more, the default reader of these prayers became the Deacon, “or other person appointed”, which implies a layman, not the priest. This was matched with a change of wording from “they” the congregation, to “we” the congregation, such as found in the Anglican Standard Text of 2019. The intercessions were now truly the Prayers of the People in the most literal sense. Gone were the sacrificial undertones of our work of intercession, and even the liturgical offerings sense was dramatically decreased. Rather than a sacrifice or an offering, the intercessions now became a work – the work of the people.

Interestingly, “the work of the people” is one of the ways to render the word liturgy into English (though I would prefer “public work” to better capture its meaning). So in that sense, putting the Prayers of the People more into the hands and mouths of the congregation makes a lot of sense. Furthermore, there is another line of precedent for this: in (at least) English custom, there was a practice of “bidding the bedes” before a sermon, which was essentially calling upon the congregation to pray for various needs in the parish, the city, the region, the realm, or indeed the world. This practice existed in parallel with the “mass intentions” in the proper canon of the liturgy, resulting in two points of intercession in the worship service, one dominated by the people’s concerns, and the other dominated by the Church. Indeed, this practice survived beyond the Reformation, and even popped up explicitly in the 1928 Prayer Book (see its page 71 and 47).

If you survey the various forms of the Prayers of the People in the 1979 Prayer Book (and similar texts put out in other provinces since), you will find that most of them have call-and-response elements, giving increased voice to the congregation. Some of them (including 2019’s own Renewed Ancient Text) are even explicit biddings, not technically praying at all, but instead instructing the congregation what to pray (be it silently or aloud).

Why not both?

This migration of the Prayers of the People over the centuries has revealed that there are indeed multiple places in the Communion liturgy where intercessions can (and should) be profitably made. In proximity to the Scripture Lessons, Creed, and Sermon, the people’s prayers naturally arise as we all respond to God’s Word and bring our own various concerns to bear. In proximity to the Offertory, a set of intercessions make sense as the congregation offers united prayer to God as part of its collective work and service. And in proximity to the consecration of Holy Communion, the Church accomplishes a priestly service, bringing to God a sacrifice of prayer, as is our bounden duty and our joy.

Given the history of our English liturgical heritage, we know that we don’t have to choose just one spot and stick with it. We can have intercessory prayers in the modern location (after the Creed) as well as in the medieval location (after the Sanctus). We don’t have to pick one or the other, or the compromise middle location (after the Offertory). All three locations have historic precedence, devotional value, and liturgical sensibility.

One easy way to experiment with this, using a modern Prayer Book such as the 2019, is to use the call-and-response Prayers of the People from the Renewed Ancient Text in the modern location, emphasizing congregational input, and then having the celebrant read the Anglican Standard Text’s Prayers of the People straight through (without responses) either after the Offertory or after the Sanctus. This way we have both the homegrown spontaneous heartfelt congregational prayers and the scripturally rich, authorized, priestly prayers of intercession for the Church and for the world. Together, these complementary postures of prayer teach all of us more about the significance of prayer in the Christian life, and shape us to pray both formally and informally, generally and specifically, as individuals and as one body.

Earth to Earth, Ashes to Ashes, Dust to Dust

As I’ve been studying the development of the Prayer Book tradition, following the lines of what changes and what stays the same, I stumble on quite the fun little surprise every now and again. My latest observation is the famous “Committal Speech”, spoken by the priest as earth is being cast upon the casket. Here are six versions of it from eight different Prayer Books, with unique phrases or terms marked in bold.

1549 1559 & 1662 1789 & 1892 1928  19622019
Forasmuch as it hath pleased Almighty God of his great mercy to take unto himself the soul of our dear brother, here departed,Forasmuch as it has pleased Almighty God, in his wise Providence, to take out of this world the soul of our deceased brother,Forasmuch as it hath pleased Almighty God of his great mercy to receive unto himself the soul of our dear brother here departed:Forasmuch as it has pleased Almighty God of his great mercy to take unto himself the soul of our dear brother, here departed,
I commend thy soul to God the Father Almighty,  Unto Almighty God we commend the soul of our brother departed, 
and thy body to the ground, earth to earth, ashes to ashes, dust to dust,we therefore commit his body to the ground, earth to earth, ashes to ashes, dust to dust,we therefore commit his Body to the ground; earth to earth, ashes to ashes, dust to dust;and we commit his body to the ground; earth to earth, ashes to ashes, dust to dust;we therefore commit his body to the ground; earth to earth, ashes to ashes, dust to dust;we therefore commit his body to the ground; earth to earth, ashes to ashes, dust to dust;
in sure and certain hope of the resurrection to eternal life, through our Lord Jesus Christ,in sure and certain hope of the resurrection to eternal life, through our Lord Jesus Christ,looking for the general resurrection in the last Day, and the life of the World to come, through our Lord Jesus Christ;in sure and certain hope of the Resurrection unto eternal life, through our Lord Jesus Christ;in sure and certain hope of the Resurrection to eternal life, through our Lord Jesus Christ;in sure and certain hope of the resurrection to eternal life, through our Lord Jesus Christ;
  at whose second coming in glorious Majesty to judge the Word, the Earth and the Sea shall give up their Dead;at whose coming in glorious majesty to judge the world, the earth and the sea shall give up their dead; 
who shall change our vile body, that it may be like to his glorious body,who shall change our vile body that it may be like to his glorious body,and the corruptible Bodies of those who sleep in him shall be changed, and made like unto his own glorious Body;and the corruptible bodies of those who sleep in him shall be changed, and made like unto his own glorious body;who shall change our mortal body, that it may be like unto his glorious body,who shall change our perishable body, that it may be like his own glorious body,
according to the mighty working whereby he is able to subdue all things to himself.according to the mighty working, whereby he is able to subdue all things to himself.according to the mighty working, whereby he is able to subdue all things unto himself.according to the mighty working whereby he is able to subdue all things unto himself.according to the mighty working, whereby he is able to subdue all things to himself.according to the mighty working of his Spirit, whereby he is able to subdue all things to himself.

I wanted to explore those fiddly little differences in order now.

The first divergence is the challenging language of God “taking to himself” the soul of the departed. Without biblical and pastoral guidance, this phrase can make God sound a little bit capricious, paving the way for that awful and cruel saying “God needed another angel in heaven.” This misunderstanding has been addressed in two different ways. First there was the early American solution: it is in God’s “wise Providence” that he is pleased to take unto himself the departed soul. This denies an arbitrary and heartless picture of God, and assures us that there is a purpose behind his will. It’s also worth noting that appeals to divine providence was a common feature of early American discourse, both in the New England Puritan context as well as in the growing Deist heretical movement that colored much the country’s founding documents.

In 1962, the Canadian solution was to switch from speaking of God “taking” to God “receiving” the departed soul. Again, God is clearly innocent of any divine malpractice, though this language may fall afoul of the opposite problem: suggesting divine helplessness, or at least haplessness.

On the other hand, the 1549 and 1928 Prayer Books side-step that problem altogether by not using that phrase at all, and beginning the Committal Speech immediately with the commendation. In both of these cases, the soul is commended to God and the body is committed to the ground. It’s interesting to observe the slightly more sacerdotal approach in 1549, with the priest himself saying “I commend thy soul…” which gives way to the communal emphasis of “we” ever thereafter.

The next part of the Speech contrasts the mortal and the immortal states. The language of our “vile” body in England switches to “corruptible” in the USA, “mortal” in Canada, and “perishable” in the ACNA.

Finally, the ACNA’s 2019 Prayer Book adds one more prepositional phrase near the very end of the Committal Speech. Christ’s “mighty working” of subduing all things to himself is clarified to be accomplished through “his Spirit”, filling out a more overtly trinitarian theology of the inseparable operations of the three Persons of the one Godhead.

It’s in tracking little changes like these that really helps illustrate why there is no such as thing as any one “perfect” Prayer Book. There are always things that can be improved, and cultural context plays a large role in that. Some doctrines may need to be highlighted more carefully at certain times; various problems and misunderstandings and heresies plague the Church in different places and times; what one cultural setting may feel is too long a prayer another may find too short, and vice versa. And so it is both good and necessary to make these little edits from time to time, in order that the one faith is most clearly communicated in each generation. Thus this principle also rules out the opposite tendency: to make changes quickly on a whim, without weighing the pastoral and doctrinal gains and losses.

The Many Texts of Pentecost

Although less popularized than Christmas and Easter, the feast of Pentecost is liturgically just as exalted, and is equally rich with seemingly endless appropriate Scripture readings to aid our celebration, edification, and instruction. As I treated the feast of the Visitation a week and a half ago, I’d like to list and identify a number of scripture readings that you can pull up to enrich your experience of the great feast of Pentecost.

For, at least traditionally, Pentecost is not just one day. In ancient times it had a full octave – eight days of liturgical commemoration starting on Sunday (yesterday) and culminating on the following Sunday, which became known as Trinity Sunday. In the Prayer Book tradition this was simplified to Sunday, Monday, and Tuesday, with Trinity Sunday being the theologically-oriented follow-up. Sadly, the modern calendar and lectionary has done away even with that, leaving us with only a single day, officially. Of course, that doesn’t mean we can’t continue the celebration despite the lack of rubrical direction! So let’s get to it.

The Main Event

Without a doubt, the primary text for the Christian holiday of Pentecost is Acts 2:1-11. There we read of the descent of the Holy Spirit in power, enabling the disciples to preach the Gospel in many languages to the multi-national crowd that was in Jerusalem at the time. Thousands came to believe in Jesus within days! For all intents and purposes, the New Covenant Church completed its secret gestation and was born into this world.

Although it doesn’t normally show up in the traditional lectionaries, the rest of Acts 2 is good reading also. It continues the story, chronicling the preaching of Saint Peter and the largely-positive response of the crowds who heard.

One of the key texts that he cites in the course of his preaching, however, is one of the commonly-appointed readings for Pentecost: Joel 2:28-32. God promises through the ancient prophet that he will pour out his Spirit upon all flesh, all his people will receive him, and Peter is pointing out that the events of his day were seeing this promise fulfilled.

The Old Testament Foundation

Pentecost, of course, was already a major Jewish holiday. In fact, it was one of the top three holy days where the Law of Moses required all men to come to the appointed place (Jerusalem) to offer sacrifice. Thus we find another traditional scripture reading: Deuteronomy 16:9-12, which could be extended to cover verses 1-17 if you want to read about the other two top feasts of the Old Covenant sacred calendar. Here Pentecost is called the Feast of Weeks, so named because of its placement seven weeks after the Passover, which remains true in the New Covenant sacred calendar: Pentecost is seven weeks after Easter. And the name “Pentecost” by the way is just the Greek-language version of this, noting the fifty days distance from Easter/Passover.

The Gospel of our Lord Jesus

The Gospel texts appointed for the feast of Pentecost are, unusually, a little sparse, since its primary text is in Acts instead. The historic liturgical appointment for the Gospel lesson on the day of Pentecost is John 14:15-31a, and in the modern lectionaries it’s John 14:8-17, so there’s a bit of overlap there. Both readings include these words of Christ:

 “If you love me, you will keep my commandments.  And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Helper, to be with you forever, even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him. You know him, for he dwells with you and will be in you.”

The older emphasis went on to read the continuing explanation of the Holy Spirit as the Helper who is to come, while the new order is to read of the unity between the Father and the Son, making the giving and indwelling of the Spirit to be the climax of the lesson.

On the subsequent days, the Prayer Book appointed Gospels are John 3:16-21 and John 10:1-10. The former is the famous text about God loving the world in such a way that he sent his only-begotten Son to give life to the dead. The latter is the beginning of Jesus’ Good Shepherd Discourse, in which he says much the same thing: “If anyone enters by me, he will be saved…” While neither of these readings speak directly of the Holy Spirit, their placement on Pentecost Monday and Tuesday invites us to recognize the realities that Jesus describes as things that are brought about in us because of the Holy Spirit’s work within us.

There’s also John 16:1-15 which pops up in the 2019 Prayer Book. Like much of the Upper Room Discourse of chapters 14-17, it is likely to have been read already on one of the previous Sundays. Here, the Spirit is again named as the Helper, but also as the Spirit of Truth who teaches and guides God’s people.

Subsequent Echoes of Pentecost

The Day of Pentecost in the book of Acts is a pivotal event, and like most pivotal events it has echoes where things kind of repeat themselves in new settings. St. Luke was clever in the way he wrote this book, for while he started with the thoroughly Jewish Pentecost in Jerusalem, he then went on to write about a similar event taking place in Samaria in Acts 8:14-17 and again among Gentiles in Acts 10:34-48. Both of these (albeit in reverse order) are the traditionally appointed readings on Pentecost Monday and Tuesday, keeping the theme and our attentions firmly anchored on the powerful gift of the Holy Spirit.

Another interesting event takes place in Acts 18:24-19:7. While this is less flashy than the previous readings, it does bring the experience down to earth a bit more, and it provides some important teaching along the way. Here, we find two brief scenarios where devoted believers in Jesus have not heard about Christian Baptism, having known only the baptism of John (the Forerunner of Christ). These short encounters provide us with the further teaching that Christian Baptism is also our primary reception of the Holy Spirit into our lives, and that without it we are severely lacking.

As it happens, the New Testament’s most prolific author, Saint Paul, missed almost all these. For most of that time he was raging against this “new sect” and trying to put Christians to death. And so his experience of the giving and the ongoing ministry of the Holy Spirit was a little bit different. Rather than focusing on specific moments in history which are descriptive, he gives us some straight-forward teaching which is prescriptive.

Romans 8:12-39 is one standout example. Through the Spirit, he writes, we receive adoption as sons of God. Indeed, the Holy Spirit serves as a sort of midwife not only for us but for all of creation, groaning for new life. And only for the start of our Christian life, the Holy Spirit continues to be our Helper through every stage of growth, all the way to the promise of eternal glory. Therefore we can live with confidence, as “more than conquerors“, knowing that the presence of the Holy Spirit within us makes us inseparable from the Father and the Son.

For a longer discourse on the gifts and empowerment of the Holy Spirit, we can also turn to 1 Corinthians 12, 13, and 14. There we read of the unity of the Body of Christ, the Spirit giving both diversity of gifts and ministries as well as unity of purpose and mutual interdependence as one Church. And although he does list a number “gifts of the Spirit,” he goes on to highlight the most important of them is love. With that in mind, he is then able to go on to write more about some of the different gifts of the Spirit like tongues and prophecy, and then wrap it up with exhortations to conducting sound worship in which everything is intelligible, decent, and in order. The Spirit is not a spirit “of confusion, but of peace.”

Saint Peter also chimes in on the primacy of love as characteristic of a Spirit-filled Christian in another scripture lesson appointed for Pentecost Tuesday in one or two Prayer Books: 1 Peter 1:17-23. There he exhorts our love as a result of our new birth from “imperishable seed“, indicating also thereby that the gift of the Spirit is not just any new life, but eternal life.

Other Old Testament Types and Shadows

Besides the establishment of the original Jewish Pentecost in the books of the Law, and the prophecy of Joel, there are countless other Old Testament texts which point forward to the feast of Pentecost in some way. At this point we’ll finish our scriptural tour in canonical order, rather than tracing any more specific topics or themes.

Genesis 11:1-9 is the story of the Tower of Babel. Its connection to Pentecost is that, here, the manifestation of multiple languages was used to divide the people, whereas on the Day of Pentecost in Acts 2 the gift of tongues was used to unite people around the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Numbers 11, or especially verses 24-30, tells the story of God sharing “the spirit upon Moses” with seventy other elders of Israel. When the Spirit comes upon them they prophecy, and Moses famously quips “Would that all the Lord’s people were prophets, that the Lord would put his Spirit on them!” This, too, has been fulfilled in the gift of Pentecost.

The story of the plague and the bronze serpent in Numbers 21:4-9 is normally associated with John 12 and the crucifixion of Christ. But it can also serve here as a backup to the preaching of St. Peter throughout the first half of the book of Acts. It also provides a handy illustration of living by faith: look up to Jesus and rely on God’s strength rather than grumbling about in your sins. Life in the Spirit changes us and redirects our attentions.

Psalm 48 is a celebration of the heavenly Jerusalem, or Zion, from where God reigns, and beneath which we wait, watch, and worship. The blowing of the East Wind and the loving-kindness of God in the midst of his Temple also can evoke pictures of the Holy Spirit’s power and presence among us his people.

Much of Psalm 68 is associated with the Ascension of Jesus, but specifically verses 1-10 also has a place among the Pentecost psalms because these verses focus a lot on the benefits that God’s people enjoy as a result of his “arising.” Pentecost is very much the promised result of Christ’s ascension, so it is sensible to continue some ascension-themed material to its fulfillment now.

Psalm 104 is a celebration of God’s work of creation. In particular, verses 24-35 summarize the psalm’s theme in identifying God’s wisdom in creating all creatures, and that it is the giving of his breath, or Spirit, that all things are made and given life.

Although a more generic psalm of praise, Psalm 116:1-4 and 12-16 show up in ancient liturgical appointments for Pentecost Tuesday. While not directly mentioning the Spirit of God, it does direct us to respond to his grace, his deliverance, all his benefits, with vows and praises and sacrifices. The gift of the Holy Spirit not only enables us, but compels us to worship him.

The last of the traditionally appointed psalms is Psalm 145, which praises God for his everlasting goodness and his unending kingdom. Its language of God giving “food in due season” and preserving “those who love him” is reminiscent of the themes in Psalm 104.

Ezekiel 36:22-28 is one of the great prophecies of the giving of the New Covenant, and this one, specifically, is the one that uses the language of removing our heart of stone and giving us a heart of flesh. This promise is flanked by two important details: “I will sprinkle clean water on you” and “I will put my Spirit within you,” thus giving us a picture of Holy Baptism and its benefits.

Ezekiel 37:1-14 follows the above prophecy with the Vision of the Valley of Dry Bones. Just as a heart of stone indicates a person who is dead inside, so too do dry bones indicate a body that is thoroughly deceased. And while the word of prophecy can reassemble and enflesh the dead, it is the breath of the Spirit of God that animates them, bringing new life. Once again, this is a major role of the Spirit in creation, and in the new creation.

Having explored the law and the prophets, we now turn to the writings. In Wisdom 7:15-8:1 we read of the role of divine wisdom, personified as a women (as found also throughout the book of Proverbs). Now, the church has traditionally found the most appropriate interpretation of Lady Wisdom to be a type of Jesus, God the Son (hence the final verse of this reading giving us the lyrics “O come Thou wisdom from on high” in the song O come O come Emmanuel). Nevertheless, as the Holy Spirit is our Helper and Guide and Teacher, and even more importantly the one who unites us with Christ, this text still reminds us of one of the great benefits of the post-Pentecostal reality of being indwelt with the Holy Spirit.

Wisdom 9:1-6, finally, is a prayer for wisdom written as if by King Solomon. The entire chapter is the full prayer, but the first six verses give us the gist of it, especially in the final line: “without the wisdom that comes from [God] he will be regarded as nothing.” Again, life without the Holy Spirit, is no life at all.

Thanks be to God for this, his greatest of gifts to his people.