An Overview of Holy Saturday

Of all the Triduum services, Holy Saturday is probably the most omitted in common practice today; liturgically it is overshadowed by its lengthy neighboring services for Good Friday and the Easter Vigil, logistically it can seem to stand in the way of preparations for the Easter service(s), and culturally it is a moment many people do not know what to do with.  Holy Saturday is the awkward “in-between” moment.  Jesus has died, but has not yet risen.  The Gospel lesson for this service, as most might expect, tells the brief story of his burial, but therein lies the problem, for our culture is one that does not handle death well.  Funerals are replaced with celebrations of life, burials are replaced with memorial services, so when it comes to the burial of our Lord, whom we know will rise again on the third day, it is all the more difficult for the modern Western heart and mind to sit still at his graveside.  This brief worship service, thus, provides for us precisely what we need to re-learn about death and mourning.  If the Good Friday service is the main event, the primary Burial service, Holy Saturday is the Committal at the graveside – the smaller, simpler, and more intimate moment of standing outside the tomb and reflecting on what has happened.  And yet Holy Saturday has other surprises in store: the doctrine of Christ’s descent into hell (Article of Religion III) is one that is often neglected in modern theological discourse, and this day in the Church Calendar focuses on that like no other.

The Collect of the Day

The two choices of collect emphasize different aspects of Holy Saturday’s Gospel narrative.  The first picks up the theme of Sabbath rest, which Jesus fulfills by “resting” on the seventh day – of his three days in the tomb, Saturday is the only one in which our Lord was dead for the full 24 hours!  We pray that we may “await with him” and “rise with him,” setting up the worshiper for a much-needed lesson in what it means to wait with Christ.  The second collect directs us, instead, toward the activity of Christ’s spirit during his bodily rest.  Here, our prayer is to “wait in hope” and to receive “a share in the glory” of God’s children.

The theme of waiting is common to both collects, but they play out in different contexts, and the officiant should choose which collect to pray based upon which emphasis (bodily rest in the tomb or spiritual activity in hell) will be prevalent in the homily.

The Lessons

Job 14:1-14 is an apt lament for a burial.  It recognizes the shortness of life, the boundaries set by God which mortals cannot cross, and bewails the apparent permanency of death.  Only at the end does it cry out to God, “appoint me a set time, and remember me” and ask “If a man die, shall he live again?”

The Psalms do not answer this question, but give the worshipers further voice to join in Job’s lament.  Psalm 130 is the classic prayer of the dead, balancing the helplessness of “the deep” with God’s mercy and plenteous redemption.  Psalm 88 is a prayer of one betrayed, whose companions are darkness and hidden, daring to ask if and when God’s loving-kindness will be revealed in the grave.  And the beginning of Psalm 31, also appointed in Compline, is an expression of trust amidst confusion; in it we pray with Jesus to the Father “into your hands I commend my spirit.”  The officiant may, as with the Collect, select which Psalm to use based upon the emphasis of the coming sermon; or, because, there are three Psalms to choose from, they may be rotated across Years A, B, and C.

1 Peter 4:1-8 begins to answer the questions and cries of Job and the Psalms: “the gospel was preached even to those who are dead, that though judged in the flesh the way people are, they might live in the spirit the way God does.”  Jesus’ descent among the dead means that the Gospel reaches even the faithful departed.  With such a hope in hand, or, knowing that “the end of all things is at hand,” we are therefore able to receive the ethical teachings of the Apostle in the spirit it was intended: not as bare rules for holy living, but as expressions of divine love fueled by the hope which Christ’s death, descent, and resurrection provides.

The Gospel, either from Matthew 27 or from John 19, may feel anticlimactic after the previous sequence.  The burial narrative is short and simple, and frankly unremarkable after the emotional roller coaster of Job, the Psalm(s), and Saint Peter.  Yet the mundanity of the Gospel lesson is precisely what the worshiper needs to understand in this moment: the glorious work of God is regularly hidden underneath appearances of normality.  An ordinary life plays host to the miraculous work of the Spirit; an ordinary bread plays host to the miraculous body of Christ; an ordinary grave plays host to the salvation of the living and dead.

The Homily and Anthem

In many ways, the Anthem (taken from the Prayer Book’s graveside service) is itself a homily, albeit in devotional form.  It begins with the words of Job, paraphrased, then moves through expressions of faith and hope much like the three Psalms provide.  It concludes in petition to our “holy and merciful Savior” that we may never fall away from him in our own pain and death.  Thus the worshipers apply the Scripture Lessons to themselves in the very reading or singing of this Anthem.

That having been said, many people are not sufficiently liturgically formed to recognize what this Anthem is doing in and through them, and therefore a homily may be said first.

The Prayers

The worship service ends with the Lord’s Prayer and the traditional Blessing from the Daily Office.  The doxology is omitted from the Lord’s Prayer for the same reason as in the Good Friday service – it is a gesture of solemnity and a restraining of celebration, reserving the joyous outcries of praise for the arrival of Easter in the night to come.

An Overview of Good Friday

The 2019 BCP’s introductory text helpfully explains the meaning and purpose behind several Lenten, Passiontide, and Good Friday traditions regarding the appearance and sound of the church.  In line with unbroken tradition through Patristic, Medieval, Reformation, and even modern piety, we are invited to remember our own role in the suffering and agony of Christ.  The Lord’s Supper, after all, is a “participation” or “communion” in the body and blood of Christ, so its larger liturgical context marks our participation or communion in the larger gospel events.  God’s people in every age and every place are therefore invited and enabled to join him at his table on Thursday, follow him to his Cross today, keep watch outside his tomb tomorrow, and partake of his resurrection as midnight (and Sunday) approach.  Knowing this full scope ahead of time, unlike the disciples some two thousand years ago, the worshiper today is able to recognize the Cross as “a sign of life, in the midst of death” and celebrate it accordingly.

The Entrance

Apart from the Daily Office of Morning Prayer, the church has been silent since the Stripping of the Altar the night before, save the whispering of night watches or vigils being kept by the faithful few.  The entrance of the ministers in silence respects that watchful tone, and their kneeling for silent prayer marks their joining of the congregation in that pious vigil.  Silence is also intensely personal, which part of what makes it so difficult to maintain in public worship: the only sounds to be heard are the prayers, questions, and distractions in each person’s own head!  But that is a particular charism of the Triduum liturgy – all are invited to invest themselves in these critical gospel moments and consider deeply their participation and responses to every word and deed of Christ.

The silence is broken either with the iconic penitential words of Isaiah or with the simple bidding “Let us pray.”

The Collect of the Day

The petition of this prayer is deceptively simple: we ask God to “behold” us.  In the context of this service, following a potential all-night vigil kept mostly in silence, asking God to look at us, to see us, to behold or take notice of us, is a deeply emotion-laden plea.  The Officiant would do well to read this collect slowly, allowing the gravity of its significance time to land in the hearts and minds of all who are gathered.  For further commentary on this collect, see the Collects for the Christian Year.

The Lessons

Two options for the Old Testament are provided.  They are listed in canonical order, which is not necessarily an order of precedence, so there are several means by which worship planners may choose between them.  One consideration is that the reading from Isaiah will have been read five days earlier on Palm Sunday, so to read it again here would give it a particular emphasis, or to read from Genesis 22 instead would be to provide a wider range of scriptural content to Holy Week.  It is worth noting, further, that both of these lessons are strongly represented through the history of the Daily Office Lectionary in the Prayer Book tradition.

All three of these Psalm readings were first appointed in the 1979 Prayer Book, and may be most simply used in rotation in line with the three-year lectionary.

Hebrews 10:1-25 is the traditional Epistle lesson for this day, addressing the subject of priestly sacrifice and the sprinkling of the faithful with the blood of the covenant for their cleansing.  This provides a theological context for the Passion of Christ as well as directions for a personal devotional response to it – the worshiper is invited to consider the “good” provided in the events of Good Friday.

The long option for the Gospel lesson is in line with the tradition of medieval practice and the first Prayer Books, whereas the shorter option is in line with Anglican practice since 1662.

The omission of the congregation responses before and after this reading is a return both to classical Prayer Book practice and to pre-Reformation custom.  This leaves the congregation once again with moments of silence surrounding the Passion of Saint John.

The rubrics regarding the manner of reading the Passion Gospel and the congregation’s sitting, standing, and kneeling at different points throughout are the same as in the Palm Sunday service.  Historically, the three-voice chanting of the Passion Gospel was practiced with all four accounts (Matthew’s on Sunday, Mark’s on Tuesday, Luke’s on Wednesday, and John’s on Friday).  The stark solemnity of this day, compared to Palm Sunday, better befits the simple chanting or reading of the Gospel by the reader, Deacon, and Priest, rather than the more elaborate affairs now commonly practiced on Palm Sunday.

The Sermon

The option to sing a hymn after the sermon is an opportunity to provide more active congregational participation.  This enables another opportunity to sing one of the many excellent Passiontide songs in Christian hymnody – opportunities which are in relative short supply in this worship service – as well as gives the people a break from the silence.

The Solemn Collects

From the angle of devotion and piety, Good Friday has many avenues to explore: sorrow and penitence for our sins, Christ’s triumph over death through death, creation’s participation and redemption in Christ through the Cross and other natural and supernatural phenomena during the crucifixion, and the work of God to bring salvation to a world otherwise condemned.  It is the latter direction that is taken up now as the officiant announces the call to prayer.

In Early Church and Medieval practice, the Deacon would direct the people to kneel for silent prayer after each bidding, and then to rise for each collect.  The rubric provided here simplifies that, allowing for any appropriate combination of standing or kneeling during this portion of the liturgy.

The first intercession: for the church

This bidding sets forth a vision of the Church not often considered in the modern evangelical imagination: not only are we to pray for her preservation in unity, peace, and safety, but also that the Church is the context in which God makes all powers and principalities subject to himself (1 Corinthians 15:27-28, Ephesians 6:12, 1 Peter 3:22).  The resulting goal is peace, or tranquilitas, a term frequently used in the history of Christian devotion to refer to a sense of quiet, wholeness, and unfettered access and attention between the soul and God.  This is thus both an eternal heavenly state to look forward to as well as a temporal state to be glimpsed within one’s own life and experience.

Archbishop Laud’s collect, then, meticulously covers several angles by which one might pray for the Church, dealing with its proclamation of the truth, its corruption, error, perverseness, rightness, need, and division.

The second intercession: for the Bishops

As in the Prayers of the People, these prayers move from the general to the particular.  The people are invited to pray for their Bishop and Archbishop, representing the “governance of God’s holy people.”  This is, therefore, a time of prayer specifically for the church’s leadership; prayer for its ministry and work will come next.

The collect answers this bidding by acknowledging God’s judgment over all creation and Christ’s role as the true Shepherd and Bishop of our souls, and praying for those aspects of his work and ministry to be carried out rightly by his appointed Bishops.  Our own “fruit of righteousness” is named as the goal of a well-ordered and rightly-governed Church, which then leads the way to the next intercession.

The third intercession: for all the clergy

Now all orders of the Church are named.  There were several “minor orders” also named in the ancient version of this Office, but as those have been discontinued they are no longer named here.

This collect was better known in the 1979 Prayer Book as one of the Prayers for Mission in Morning Prayer.  While terms such as “vocation and ministry” are most typically used to refer to members of the clergy, they may also be rightly used to describe the work and calling of all Christians.

The fourth intercession: for the state

Similar to the first set of prayers for the Church, prayer for a national government is also directed toward the glory of God and his eternal purposes.  We are bid, here, to pray that our leaders would realize their fealty to God and to seek his honor and glory, so that we can honor them with faithful obedience as God’s Word directs us to do.

The prayer, then, contrasts our brief earthly kingdoms with God’s everlasting kingdom and infinite power.  We pray for the safety of our country and its leaders, as well as for the spiritual gifts necessary for right governance and for their adherence to God’s calling upon their lives to be public servants operating in the fear of the Lord, which is the beginning of wisdom.  Like the Prayers of the People in the Communion rites (and unlike the ancient versions of these prayers), this collect does not assume that the President, Prime Minister, Sovereign, or other sort of governor is a Christian.  Rather, we pray for Christ’s direction in their lives either in line with their professed faith or in spite of their lack of faith in him.

The fifth intercession: for those preparing for Holy Baptism

It is highly likely that many congregations will not have any catechumens or converts preparing for Baptism or Confirmation on any given Good Friday.  Thus this intercession helps pull the worshiper (and entire congregation) out of their own local context and into the global, Catholic, context of the whole Church.  We pray for open hearts, so that the “washing of regeneration” (Titus 3:5) may bring such persons not only the forgiveness of sins (Acts 2:38) but also to a state of faithful servanthood (Matthew 25:19-23).

The collect repeats most of what the bidding contains, but using different terms: “open their hearts” becomes “gifts of faith and understanding”, God’s “grace and mercy” become instruction in his “holy Word”, the “washing of regeneration” becomes “born again”, and “faithful servants” become “adopted children.”

The sixth intercession: for deliverance from all evils

In terms of the Prayers of the People and the Great Litany, this is parallel to the prayers for “all those who are in trouble, sorrow, need, sickness, or any other adversity.”  The scope of this intercession, however, is made even wider in naming such natural disasters as pestilence and famine.  The earliest forms of this bidding also included those on pilgrimages and those traveling by ship at sea, but since long-distance travel is normally much safer today, those concerns have been truncated to a single phrase here.

As God specially hears the “deep sighing of the poor” in Psalm 12:5 and of the oppressed in Exodus 22:27, and mirroring the expression “let my cry come to you” in several other psalms, this Solemn Collect recognizes the privilege that the prayers of those in need have before the Lord.  Not only that, but our own strength to serve them and relieve their needs is also a subject of prayer for divine aid (cf. Matthew 25:31-40).

The seventh intercession: for those in heresy or schism

Even from the earliest centuries of Christianity, the Church has been sadly plagued with heresy and riven with schismatic movements.  This bidding to prayer puts one in mind of the error and division of Christianity’s many denominations in our day, as well as the countless sects and religions that have been created falsely claiming the name of Christ.  On a more personal level, this bidding refers us not only to churches and assemblies but also to individuals – people known to the congregation who are walking (or have walked) away from the Christian faith to some degree or another.

The collect begins with the familiar phraseology of the Ash Wednesday Collect and petitions God’s mercy on those who have been deceived.  The Church’s desire, as God’s, is that none should perish by that all should be saved by being restored in the wisdom and way of Christ and his bride, the Church.

The eighth intercession: for the Jewish people

The early Christian vision of the world saw three people in three categories: Christian, Jewish, and Pagan.  Christians, of course, hold the full revelation of God in Jesus Christ.  Jews hold a partial revelation of God but reject the truth to which it points; Pagans hold no special revelation and have only the natural law to guide them.  Thus it was traditional to pray for Jews and Pagans in different ways, according to their respective situations.  Where the ancient version of this intercession was more negative, emphasizing the need to remove darkness (or veil) under which the Jewish religion exists, this bidding is more positive, asking for God’s grace to bring them to know the Lord Jesus as the object of their as-yet-unfulfilled faith.

The collect, likewise, looks back to God’s covenant with Abraham, on which both the Jewish and Christian conceptions of covenantal union with God are based (cf. Romans 4).  We recognize that the world was blessed through the Jews (John 4:22), and pray that they will receive that same blessing of salvation themselves.

The ninth intercession: for all unbelievers

Where the ancient liturgy prayed for “pagans” we now pray for nonbelievers without attempting to label them, thus acknowledging the broad religious (and non-religious) scope of the world around us without resorting to generalizations or oversimplification.  Whatever strands of truth a given religion, sect, or philosophy might rightly grasp, the basic issue is that the Gospel of Jesus Christ – in whose name alone one may be saved (Acts 4:12) – is not believed among these people.  Thus we are called upon to pray for their enlightenment.

The collect is similarly phrased to encompass all non-believers fairly and accurately.  These are “all who do not know you as you are revealed in your Son” and we pray for the Gospel’s grace and power to be present in their midst (Acts 6:8).  We pray for hearts to be turned, for the lost to return home, and for the unity of the human race in one flock under one Shepherd (John 10:16).

The tenth intercession: for the resurrection

As the Prayers of the People and Great Litany conclude with prayers for the departed and our share with them in eternity, so too does our version of the Solemn Collects conclude with an eye toward the life to come.  We pray not simply for holy lives for the present’s sake, but for lives of faith that lead to a state of worthiness to enter into the joy of our Lord (Matthew 25:21, 23).  And by naming the departed in this prayer, we are reminded that they also have not yet reached that blessed state of eternal bliss

The collect provides further context for the scope of our salvation: the Church is a mystery (Ephesians 5:32) in which God sovereignly works out his plan of salvation (Ephesians 1:10).  Specifically, this prayer describes “things which were cast down” as “being raised up”, which not only echoes the Magnificat and the Canticle of Hannah (1 Samuel 2:1-10) but also poetically recasts Saint Paul’s teachings on redemption by recapitulation in Christ (Romans 5:12-21).  Thus we see the Christian life and reality as one of restoration and reconciliation rather than simply death and resurrection.

Devotions Before the Cross

The use of a wooden (and not metal or stone) cross for the purposes of adoration is significant, and this is reflected in the words of the antiphon: “Behold the wood…”  While on one hand the symbol of the Cross itself is hugely significant in Christian art and iconography, the particular subject of this devotional practice since the Early Church is concerned with the Cross as a “tree” (cf. the apostolic preaching in Acts 5:30, 10:39, 13:29, and 1 Peter 2:24, with their various Old Testament types).  Likened to a tree, the Cross can be said to bear fruit (namely, Christ, and the blood and water from his side whence flows our salvation).  Furthermore, and perhaps more fundamentally, this imagery also establishes the Cross as nature’s own participation in the Gospel of our salvation.  Just as the stones would cry out if no one sang Christ’s praise (Luke 19:40), the Cross was Christ’s most faithful companion through his crucifixion.  Meditations such as these arose early in the English Christian imagination, resulting in great poems such as the Old English masterpiece The Dream of the Rood, or “Vision of the Cross.”  The most explicit liturgical expression of this line of devotional insight is found in the hymn endorsed in the rubric on the bottom of BCP page 574, Sing my tongue the glorious battle.  That ancient hymn contains the following stanzas:

Faithful cross! above all other / One and only noble tree!
None in foliage, none in blossom, / None in fruit thy peer may be;
Sweetest wood and sweetest iron!  / Sweetest weight is hung on thee.

Bend thy boughs, O tree of glory! / Thy relaxing sinews bend;
For awhile the ancient rigor / That thy birth bestowed, suspend;
And the King of heavenly beauty / On thy bosom gently tend!

These words, emerging from the biblical-liturgical mindset of the Early Church and written by a 6th-century hymnist, metaphorically call upon the powerful Tree of the Cross to suspend and relax its natural roughness and strength so as to embrace the crucified Lord more gently and lovingly.  Together, Christ and Cross form a faithful duo at the most critical moment of human history.  The arms of the Cross upheld the arms of the Savior interceding for all mankind, like Aaron and Hur upholding the arms of Moses (Exodus 17:12).

The Reproaches

These devotions do something quite rare in Western practice: they form a dialogue between Christ and the congregation.  Few songs and hymns venture to put words into the mouth of God, and devotional writings that do so tend to reveal themselves to be unhinged from biblical fidelity and contrary to Christian orthodoxy (literally, “right worship”).  Through the course of the Church’s history, only the most venerable of mystics have ventured to pen such dialogues with the divine, and even these typically remain best-suited for the monastic context in which they were conceived, generally inaccessible to ordinary Christian piety.  The few dialogues that do stand out in Christian devotion survive because (1) they have stood the test of time through the centuries and (2) they stick closely to the language of Scripture, and these Solemn Reproaches tick both of those boxes.

This devotion contains six stanzas, each with the Trisagion as a responsory refrain.  Each stanza is a set of questions or accusations (hence “reproaches”) from the mouth of Christ, and the Trisagion is our only response, knowing our own guilt.

The first stanza opens with the question that will repeat several times: “what have I done… how have I wearied you?”  This question is drawn from Micah 6:3, and 6:4 contains the first part of God’s testimony (he brought us forth from Egypt).  This, with a reference to the crossing of the Red Sea, is contrasted with sinful humanity’s response of preparing a Cross for him.

The second stanza evokes the account of Exodus 16 and its later reflection in Psalm 105, along with the arrival in the Promised Land, again contrasting this with the crucifixion.

The third stanza draws from the words of Moses and Samuel, prompting us to consider what God has done for us (Deuteronomy 10:21, 1 Samuel 12:24).  The image of God’s people as a vineyard (cf. Isaiah 5 and Ezekiel 19) is contrasted with the vinegar offered back to Christ (cf. Psalm 69:22 and all four Passion narratives).

The fourth stanza contrasts the deliverance of Israel from the tenth plague of Egypt with the deliverance of Jesus over to death (Matthew 20:19, et al), and the “leadership” of the cloudy pillar with Gabbatha (Exodus 13:21-22 and John 19:13).

The fifth stanza turns to pairs of striking down enemies and crowning kings: pitting Psalm 135:10-11 against Matthew 27:30, and Exodus 19:6 against Mark 15:17.

Finally, the Reproaches reach their climax with the images of opening-and-pouring-out and lifting-up-on-high.  Christ provided water from the rock in the wilderness and was himself opened up on the Cross by a spear (Exodus 17 and John 19:34).

In all this, the worshiper is invited to consider God asking “what I have done to you to deserve this?  How have I wearied you?  Testify against (or answer!) me.”  At each accusation or indictment, we are directed to recognize and own our complicity with sin, making no excuses before our Lord, and instead asking in reply only for his mercy.  Although solemn, grave, and deeply penitential, these are no morbid or hopeless pleas.  The Trisagion is not so much a confession of guilt as it is a confession of faith: yes, God is holy, mighty, and immortal, yet it is his property (or character) always to have mercy, and therefore we still have the ability to ask “have mercy upon us.”  If God did not love the sinner and seek out the lost, then such prayers as these would be unwarranted and impossible.

The Anthems

As if in answer to the Reproaches, the antiphons of both of these anthems direct the worshiper back to a posture of praise and adoration.  Even though the death of Christ on the Cross was a horrible evil for which all of mankind shares guilt, that death was also his glory as the Savior, and becomes our glory and joy as we are found in him.

The words of Psalm 67, furthermore, celebrate and pray for the furtherance of God’s mercy among all the nations of the earth, anticipating a future where God receives praise from all peoples.

The second anthem instead takes an expression of praise from a normally-didactic text, providing the Psalm’s Old Testament prophetic perspective with a New Testament clarification: death with Christ yields life with Christ and eternal blessing thereafter.

Distribution of Communion

In line with early, medieval, Roman, and Eastern practice, the full Communion service is not used on Good Friday.  This navigates a tricky dilemma: from the perspective of heightened solemnity, discipline, and self-denial, it is inappropriate for the Church to rehearse the joy-filled prayers that comprise the celebration of Holy Communion; while from the perspective of Holy Friday being Good Friday, the very day on which our Lord performed his saving sacrifice it is eminently appropriate that the Church should partake of the sacrifice of her redemption.  The reservation and redistribution of Holy Communion from a previous service (Palm Sunday in Eastern practice, Maundy Thursday in the West) became the solution to Good Friday’s conundrum.

However, not all Anglican churches are prepared to bear the logistics of consecrating and reserving bread and wine.  Indeed, some reject the practice, as did many of the Anglican divines of the 17th century.  The solution to this issue, therefore, is not to serve Communion at all on Good Friday, as the second rubric describes.

For those following the ancient practice as retrieved in this Prayer Book (as well as the 1979 Book and similar modern worship resources), the Good Friday service continues with the Confession and Absolution of Sin.  Although the two Communion rites allow for their respective prayers of confession to be swapped interchangeably, the default recommendation provided here is the confession of the Anglican Standard Text.  It is longer, more thorough, and more grave in tone, befitting Good Friday more profoundly than its counterpart from the 20th century.  For similar reasons, only the longer bidding to confession is provided beforehand.

No Comfortable Words follow the Absolution.  This, too, is a nod to the solemnity of Good Friday – all elements of joy and comfort are muted in order to keep the worshipers focused on the gravity of their sins, the Cross, and the Passion of Christ our Lord.  The lack of doxology at the end of the Lord’s Prayer accords with the same logic.

Of the two usual Invitations spoken by the celebrant, only one is provided.  Where “the gifts of God for the people of God” may be the more commonly-used, the Invitation taken from John 1:29 is far more appropriate.  That very Lamb of God, or sacrifice made upon the Cross, is now offered to the people to “Behold,” and then to eat and drink.

While music during the distribution of Holy Communion is customary in many places, the spirit of the Good Friday service is such that the distribution is best ministered in silence.  Note that the ministers’ words to the recipients are not provided here – even these standard speeches are silenced!  That said, a hymn or anthem may be selected for this point in the service if great care is taken to choose a song that maintains the solemnity and gravity of the moment, rather than undercutting it with a sudden tonal shift.

To conclude the service, the Post-Communion prayer, blessing, and recessional hymn are neither appointed nor appropriate.  Just as the bulk of the eucharistic prayers were traditionally deemed too celebratory for Good Friday, so are these usual features of the end of the Communion service unadvisable in this rite.  Instead, there is provided a special Concluding Prayer.  It is addressed to Jesus, which is relatively uncommon amongst liturgical prayers.  The primary petition is that he would set the Cross – his suffering and death – in between our sinful souls and his righteous judgment.  This is the Gospel of the Cross in a nutshell!  Christ has interposed his own Passion between the sharp sword of his mouth and our souls which would be pierced by it (Isaiah 49:2, Hebrews 4:12).  We pray for this intervention both “today” (Psalm 95:8, Hebrews 3:7-4:10) and in our hour of death (one’s last chance to make amends before God and men).  Beyond ourselves and individuals, we then pray for all believers: the living, the dead, the Church in her perfection, and us sinners in our need.

The direction to depart in silence signifies that the liturgy is not truly concluded, but is once again only pausing, waiting to continue on the next day.  As on Maundy Thursday, people may be tacitly invited to remain for silent prayer and devotion.  And, as the introductory text noted, other public devotions may soon follow, such as Stations of the Cross or the Seven Last Words.  Whatever the specific schedule of events, the unfinished feeling of this service should point people to the liturgical reality that the story is not over yet: ahead remains yet Christ’s burial and repose in the tomb, and only after that the vigil of his resurrection.

An Overview of Maundy Thursday

One of the major changes to the Prayer Book tradition in the 20th century, culminating in the American Prayer Book of 1979, is the restoration of unique Triduum services to mark the end of Holy Week and Lent.  Maundy Thursday, Good Friday, and Holy Saturday form a triduum or “trilogy of days” which together form a coherent whole, seamlessly uniting biblical narrative, public piety, and theological instruction.  The introductory text states that the services of these three days (leading to the Great Vigil of Easter) “form a single liturgy.”  This accounts for the lack of blessings and dismissals at the end of all but the last of these services, the lack of celebration of Holy Communion on Friday and Saturday, awkward periods of silence, and several other features that may seem quirky in isolation.  As a whole, the Triduum services form an epic experience of worship and devotion filled to the brim with doctrinal instruction and biblical immersion, but this is also their weakness.  For those who attend only one of the three days, the full context is missed, and the liturgy, literally the “public work”, is not able to work to its full potential upon such an individual’s heart and mind.  To address this issue, the classical Prayer Book tradition offers us some alternatives which shall be considered through the following service commentaries.

The name “Maundy Thursday,” as explained here, comes from the traditional evening celebration which focused on our Lord’s washing of the disciples’ feet.

The Acclamation and Sentences

The service may begin with a processional hymn like a normal eucharistic celebration but the opening rubric encourages the option of silence.  As in the Ash Wednesday and Palm Sunday services, silence will continue to be one of the most powerful tools in this and the following two rites.

The four Opening Sentences together form a brief Address in which the celebrant introduces the biblical chronology of this evening’s commemoration.  Each sentence names Jesus by a different title relevant to his subsequent works: “Christ the Son of Man” gathers with his disciples; “Christ our Lord and Master” became a lowly foot-washing servant; “Christ our God” inaugurated the Sacrament of Holy Communion out the Passover meal; “Christ the Lamb of God” gave himself up for his own execution.  Depending upon the extent of the enactment of the liturgy, all four of these may be observed in the service to follow.

The Lessons

The beginning of Exodus 12 describes the Passover meal which provides the Old Testament context for the Last Supper.

Psalm 78:15-26 celebrates the manna that God provided in the desert during the Exodus years.  This “food from heaven” and “bread of angels” provides another significant Old Testament context for the eucharistic feast that Christ inaugurates.

The Epistle contains what is actually the first recorded account of the Last Supper, as 1 Corinthians was likely written in the year 53 or 54 during Saint Paul’s ministry and the Gospels weren’t written until the 60’s or 70’s, toward the end of the Apostles’ lives.  The final portion of the reading is labeled as optional, but historically it was always included.  The warning in those verses against profaning the body and blood of Christ is expounded in the Exhortation to Holy Communion; the only feasible reason to omit reading these verses here is if the Exhortation is going to be said later in this service.

As for the Gospels, John 13 has the most historical precedent as being the standard Gospel for this service for a thousand years until the Reformation.  The reading from Luke 22 allows the preacher to bring two different narratives of the Last Supper together before the congregation’s attention, making it a good choice if that biblical narrative is to be the focus of the sermon.  Otherwise, the Foot-Washing Gospel should take pride of place in this service.

The Foot-Washing

After the sermon, the Celebrant introduces the worshipers to the next unique feature of this worship service.  The Address provided here explains the mentality behind Jesus’ example: Christian strength and growth comes from humility, or “lowly service.”  The washing of others’ feet was the epitome of lowly service in the Middle East in the first century, so for our Lord and God to undertake such a role infuses Christianity with a distinct conception of authority and service which has thoroughly permeated ever Christian (and post-Christian!) culture ever since.

Traditionally, the washing of the feet is carried out by the rector or vicar and received by members of the vestry or other representatives of the congregation.  However, this is not specified in the rubrics either in the 1979 Prayer Book or in this.  Thus it has become the custom of some that not only do the clergy wash others’ feet, but anyone in the congregation may wash the feet of others.  This presents some difficult questions.  On one hand this innovation rightly grasps and applies the final command of Christ in the Gospel: “you also ought to wash one another’s feet.”  All Christians are called to lives of humility, serving one another no matter how lofty or lowly the job.  On the other hand, Jesus gave this instruction to his disciples, not to his larger crowd of followers, and the imagery of lowly service is predicated on the fact that the one who humbles himself before others is indeed of a higher rank than them.  Thus the foot-washing command is incumbent upon pastors washing the feet of their flock, and for everyone to wash one another’s feet is to miss the profundity of the leader kneeling before the follower.

During the foot-washing, it is customary for the choir to sing an anthem special to the occasion.  Similar to the Offertory and (at least in the 1549 Prayer Book) the Communion, scripture verses are offered as anthems alongside the reality of other traditional songs being known and available.

The Communion and Beyond

After this, the Communion service continues with the Prayers of the People and proceeds normally until the Post-Communion Prayer.  At that point (1) the Reserved Sacrament may be processed to the Altar of Repose, then (2) the Altar may be stripped, to the reading or chanting of Psalm 22, and then (3) the service ends without dismissal and the people either depart in silence or remain for prayer and vigil before the Altar of Repose, liturgically joining Christ in Gethsemane to keep watch (for at least) one hour.

The reason for this silence is twofold.  First, it is part of the liturgical drama of re-living our Lord’s last night and day before his death; by departing in silence the worshiper is not only put in mind of the disciples’ unceremonious scattering from Jesus upon his arrest, but also experiences something of that discomfort in a visceral manner.  The second reason is that the modern (or renewed medieval) Triduum services are conceived of as a continuous whole:

  1. Holy Communion commemorating the Foot-Washing and the Last Supper
  2. The Reservation of the Blessed Sacrament
  3. The Stripping of the Altar
  4. The Watches, or Night Vigil, perhaps concluding with Tenebrae
  5. The Passion and Solemn Collects of Good Friday
  6. Devotions before (or Stations of) the Cross
  7. Distribution of Communion (or Mass of the Presanctified)
  8. The Holy Saturday Service with Burial Anthem
  9. The Great Vigil of Easter, consisting of: The Liturgy of Light and Exsultet, The Vigil of Lessons, Holy Baptism, and the First Mass of Easter

And, of course, punctuating all these are the Daily Offices of Morning and Evening Prayer.  Thus the 2019 Prayer Book endorses:

  1. Thursday Evening Prayer
  2. The Maundy Thursday Service
  3. Thursday Compline
  4. Tenebrae*
  5. Friday Morning Prayer
  6. Way (or Stations) of the Cross*
  7. The Good Friday Service
  8. The Seven Last Words of Christ*
  9. Friday Evening Prayer
  10. Friday Compline
  11. Saturday Morning Prayer
  12.  The Holy Saturday Service
  13. Saturday Evening Prayer
  14. The Great Vigil of Easter

* These services are endorsed on BCP page 564, but forms for their observance are not provided in the Prayer Book itself.

What is a Penitential Season?

In our religious discourse and in our Prayer Book we often describe Lent as a “Penitential season”. Advent is often described this way too, though some like to argue that it is not, or is less penitential than Lent. In any case, what I want to explore today is “what is a penitential season?”

Penitence is a posture and set of acts that express sorrow for sin, doing penance, pursuing holiness and healing in the wake of repentance from wrongdoing. A penitential season, therefore, is a period of time in which someone (or more usually the whole church) engages in this with a defined beginning and end.

What easily gets lost in the mix is that, if we are (or if one is) to have a set time of penitence, there must first be a time of self-examination culminating in a confession or act of contrition or resolution to make amends. After all, there’s little use in expressing sorrow for sin one hasn’t yet identified, in doing penance without being assigned any by a confessor, in pursuing healing before the medicine has been prescribed. In short: a “Penitential Season” needs a “Self-Examination Season” to come first, otherwise the penitential season is just glorified gloominess.

Too often, this is how we approach Lent. We come into the season and remember “oh yes, this is the time to think extra hard about my sins and what I can give up and how to be a better Christian and grow closer to Jesus. And I guess I’m not supposed to Alleluia in the worship service for six weeks because I’m supposed to be sad in church or something.” This jumble, while well-intentioned and technically correct, does not reflect wise preparation and lacks the insight and aid of church tradition.

In the old calendar, before the 1970’s, the season of Lent was preceded by three Sundays, called “Pre-Lent” or the “Gesima Sundays” after their Latin names: Septuagesima, Sexagesima, and Quinquagesima. However we name or label them, the themes of the readings through these days pointed the congregation toward questions of self-reflection and examination. The traditional practice was that by the end of this period everyone would make their confession to the priest (typically on Shrove Tuesday) so that on the next day (Ash Wednesday) everyone would be ready to worship the Lord in a unified act of penitence, and enter into the season of Lent with an actual plan or intention for increased spiritual discipline.

The modern calendar has, sadly, done away with this valuable period of reflection, and many preachers who serve in churches that do retain the Pre-Lent Sundays don’t always take proper advantage of those weeks to prepare people for their Lenten observance.

However, the attentive preacher can still find fodder for preparing people for Lent in the modern calendar and lectionary. In Year A of the three-year cycle the Gospel lessons through the season of Epiphany walk through portions of the Sermon on the Mount (mostly from Matthew 5). Our Lord’s teachings on holiness in these passages provide excellent material for self-examination in the final weeks before the season of Lent begins. That is what I strove to do in the past three weeks before writing this. In Year B the readings offer fewer obvious aids to this theme, but it must be noted that on the 6th Sunday of Epiphany the epistle lesson is 1 Corinthians 9:24-27 which happens to be the traditional Epistle for the first of the three Pre-Lent Sundays! In Year C, if the Epiphany season is long enough, its Gospel readings also reach Luke’s version of the Sermon on the Mount in chapter 6. And those are just the obvious lectionary opportunities; an attentive preacher will be able to prepare the congregation for Lent appropriately with nearly any biblical text at hand.

Passion Week: anticipating Holy Week

Users of the 2019 Prayer Book may notice that yesterday (the 5th Sunday in Lent) is labeled “Passion Sunday”. This can be a little confusing for those unaccustomed to the classical Prayer Book tradition, or pre-modern Western Catholicism in general, because we’re used to thinking of Palm Sunday as the day when we observe the passion and death of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Let’s briefly explain that.

Most major Sundays in the calendar have a follow-up Sunday to give it further explanation and context: Easter Sunday is followed by a Sunday that looks at the events of Easter evening; Pentecost is followed by Trinity Sunday to explain how this third person of the godhead still does not threaten monotheism; Christmas is followed by the Circumcision (before 1928 anyway; since then there’s been a 2nd Sunday in Christmas which fulfills the same role with different scripture readings). But Palm Sunday doesn’t have room for a follow-up Sunday, because the next Sunday after that is Easter Day. Granted, the entirety of Holy Week is a wonderfully slow-motion examination of the events of Palm Sunday, but in terms of having an actual Sunday dedicated to giving it further context you have to look backwards instead of forwards, and that gives us the 5th Sunday in Lent. So on this “Passion Sunday” we anticipate Palm Sunday by looking at the blood of the covenant. The traditional Epistle lesson is from Hebrews 9, examining the blood of Christ as the giving of the New and better Covenant, over against the Old Mosaic Covenant. On Passion Sunday we examine the sacrifice of Jesus as our Great High Priest, in preparation for examining the sacrifice of Jesus as the Spotless Victim on Palm Sunday.

With that traditional background in mind, I’d like to recommend a modern take on observing “Passion Week” in preparation for Holy Week. Specifically, as Holy Week walks through the events that surround our Lord’s crucifixion (Matthew 27, Mark 15, Luke 23, John 19), why not look at the ‘previous chapter’ throughout this week? Let’s pick up where Jesus and his disciples leave the Upper Room and head over to the Garden of Gethsemane.

#1: Peter’s Denial Foretold
Hebrews 3:12-19, Psalm 53, Matthew 26:30-35 or Mark 14:26-31

Saint Peter and the others express confidence that they will never fall away, despite Jesus’ warning. The reading from Hebrews continues that warning against falling away and points it toward us, and the Psalm hammers that home even further with the indictment: “The fool says in his heart, ‘there is no God’.

#2: Our Lord’s Prayer in the Garden
1 Samuel 3, Psalm 116:12-end, Matthew 26:36-46 or Mark 14:32-42 or Luke 22:39-46

As Samuel learned to pray and listen to God’s voice in the middle of the night, so Jesus shows the perfected art of nighttime vigil, pleading with the Father for mercy yet submitting his human will to the divine will. The Psalm allows us to join in with his prayer, lifting up the cup of salvation and recognizing the blessedness of the death the Holy One.

#3 (and #8): Our Lord’s Betrayal
Isaiah 33:1-10, Psalm 109:1-15, John 18:1-14

As Judas betrays his Lord, we are reminded in Psalm 109 of the curse that Peter would later identify against him for his treachery. Isaiah’s prophecy also speaks against the likes of Judas, promising destruction upon the destroyer.

#4: Our Lord’s Betrayal Arrest
Colossians 1:9-13, Psalm 107:10-18, Matt. 26:47-56 or Mark 14:43-52 or Luke 22:47-53

When Jesus is arrested we see the long-building of conflict between worldly darkness and divine light coming to a head. It is ironic that the crowd must carry torches to light the way through their own dark world in order capture and detain the Light of the World. The Epistle and the Psalm, therefore, direct us to reflect on our redemption from the domain of darkness.

#5 (or #9): Peter’s Denial Before the Cock Crows
Isaiah 22:1-4, Psalm 88:13-end, Luke 22:54-62 or Matt. 26:69-75 or Mark 14:66-72

Jesus is totally abandoned by his earthly companions. Isaiah’s prophecy call out the “leaders” for their flight, Psalm 88 expresses our Lord’s loneliness having lost all his friends from sight, and Saint Peter realizes his shame yet cannot now repent of his denials.

#6: Our Lord is Mocked and Beaten
Isaiah 65:1-7, Psalm 74:9-19, Luke 22:63-65

Isaiah speaks of a holy servant of God who stands silent before his mockers, and that is what we read here fulfilled in Luke’s account. “How long is the enemy to scoff?” we ask ourselves in the Psalm, and then go on to encourage ourselves with the truth of our Lord’s reign despite the appearances the moment.

#7: Our Lord’s Trial before the Jewish Council
Jeremiah 38:14-28, Psalm 110, Matthew 26:57-68 or Mark 14:53-65 or Luke 22:66-71

The Prophet Jeremiah was subjected to a stacked court, and was only saved at the last minute by the King. Jesus, too, is subjected to an unfair (and even illegal) trial, with false accusations being thrown at him. In both scenarios it is the Word of the God which they both speak which finally earns them a verdict of blasphemy. Psalm 110 stands as a testimony of God’s eternal promises to his Anointed One.

#8 (or #3 continued): The Unfaithfulness of Annas and Peter
Isaiah 33:1-10, Psalm 109:1-15, John 18:15-27

Peter begins to deny his association with Jesus while the senior priest Annas also demands Jesus’ respect and rejects his teachings. As before against Judas, Isaiah 33 and Psalm 109 speak against those who betray the Lord’s Christ.

#9 (or #5): Peter’s Denial Before the Cock Crows
Isaiah 22:1-4, Psalm 88:13-end, Matt. 26:69-75 or Mark 14:66-72 or Luke 22:54-62

Jesus is totally abandoned by his earthly companions. Isaiah’s prophecy call out the “leaders” for their flight, Psalm 88 expresses our Lord’s loneliness having lost all his friends from sight, and Saint Peter realizes his shame yet cannot now repent of his denials.

#10: Our Lord’s Trial before Pontius Pilate
Sirach 4:20-28, Psalm 45:1-9, John 18:28-40

The wisdom of Sirach cautions us never to speak against truth, even before rulers, even unto death, and that is precisely what Jesus does until Pilate finally scoff’s “What is truth?” Psalm 45, in turn, celebrates the true and beautiful lordship of Christ.

If you want to see a roadmap for how you can organize these devotions through all three of the modern lectionary years, here’s a handy table:

Year AYear BYear C
Monday
Hebrews 3:12-19
Psalm 53
Matthew 26:30-35
Monday
Hebrews 3:12-19
Psalm 53
Mark 14:26-31
 
Tuesday
1 Samuel 3
Psalm 116:12-end
Matthew 26:36-46
Tuesday
1 Samuel 3
Psalm 116:12-end
Mark 14:32-42
Monday
1 Samuel 3
Psalm 116:12-end
Luke 22:39-46
Wednesday
Isaiah 33:1-10
Psalm 109:1-15
John 18:1-14
  
Thursday
Colossians 1:9-13
Psalm 107:10-18
Matthew 26:47-56
Wednesday
Colossians 1:9-13
Psalm 107:10-18
Mark 14:43-52
Tuesday
Colossians 1:9-13
Psalm 107:10-18
Luke 22:47-53
  Wednesday
Isaiah 22:1-4
Psalm 88:13-end
Luke 22:54-62
  Thursday
Isaiah 65:1-7
Psalm 74:9-19
Luke 22:63-65
Friday
Jeremiah 38:14-28
Psalm 110
Matthew 26:57-68
Thursday
Jeremiah 38:14-28
Psalm 110
Mark 14:53-65
Friday
Jeremiah 38:14-28
Psalm 110
Luke 22:66-71
 Friday
Isaiah 33:1-10
Psalm 109:1-15
John 18:15-27
 
Saturday
Isaiah 22:1-4
Psalm 88:13-end
Matthew 26:69-75
Saturday
Isaiah 22:1-4
Psalm 88:13-end
Mark 14:66-72
 
  Saturday
Sirach 4:20-28
Psalm 45:1-9
John 18:28-40

Balancing Stability and Variety in the Eucharistic Rite

This can be a touchy subject. Some people are very passionate about their liturgical sensibilities; some people literally couldn’t care less. Some people insist that variety is the spice of life and the worship service must be constantly changing lest it become stale and mindlessly regimented. Others insist that variety is vanity and stability in the liturgy is superior, providing consistent discipleship and formative value that would be undermined by constant changes. And of course there are ways that others still attempt to balance these conflicting poles of thought.

On the whole I am largely in the “stability” camp, and I don’t want a given church to be constantly reinventing its liturgy. I do believe that repetition is essential to growth – this is how we exercise for physical fitness, this is how artists get better at their art, this is how students learn things. Inconsistent worship breeds an inconsistent approach to theology, as worship is really the front line of theology – how we approach and interact with God in prayer is the first step of articulating actual doctrine and teaching. Thus I am very much a Prayer Book loyalist: stick to the text, and keep variation to a minimum.

But therein lies an awkward question: stick to which text?

I’ve heard it joke that the Joy of Anglicanism is getting to argue about worship for the rest of your life. And the potentiality is certainly there: every province has its own version of the Book of Common Prayer, and some are more different than others. And besides the Prayer Book there have been many edits, supplements, occasional services, missals, and alternative lectionaries, such that 100 congregations could each have a different eucharistic service order. Not to say that this is a unique feature: there are multiple versions of the Roman Rite, both historically and in the present day; the Lutherans have long since branched out from Luther’s original German Mass; Presbyterians rarely offer more than “guidelines” for structuring a worship service, and the rest of the Protestant world is largely in do-whatever-you-want mode, which usually means the congregation is at the mercy of their pastor’s private sensibilities.

So if I want a stable, formative, orthodox, and coherent Anglican Prayer Book service every Sunday morning, where do I turn? How do I decide what is best?

STEP ONE: Conformity

“Conformity” is such a bad word in modern American culture, but in terms of church worship it’s very much a value. It is good for churches to submit to one another out of reverence for Christ and to be on the same page as one another. If we are indeed one body then we really ought to be growing together in roughly the same ways. Conformity in my case means using the edition of the Prayer Book that my province of the church (the Anglican Church in North America) has promulgated, the Prayer Book of 2019. 

STEP TWO: Utilizing the Basic Options

In that book there are two Communion rites (the Anglican Standard and the ‘Renewed Ancient’), and of that book there are two version (contemporary language and traditional liturgical English). Therefore there are four choices for Holy Communion. Here’s how I treat them:

To explain, the Anglican Standard Text is the first Communion Rite in the book, and should be understood to be our standard (hence the name), so I give it pride of place. The second rite, somewhat anachronistically called the Renewed Ancient Text, is a consolidation of the liturgical experimentation of the 1960’s and 70’s which became regnant in the Episcopal church, so its place in the Anglican tradition is widespread yet still very recent. I currently only use it on the Sundays from Christmas through Epiphanytide, largely on account of the fact that the eucharistic prayers mention the Virgin Mary, and that’s the time of year most suited to emphasizing the incarnation of our Lord. I also have it down for holy days commemorating relatives of Jesus (Joseph, Mary, her parents, John the Baptist, and his parents).

STEP THREE: Tastefully Dipping into our History

There’s another feature in our Prayer Book which is easily missed, but of great significance: older orders of service are permitted, using the material in the 2019 Prayer Book. The order of events in the Anglican Communion service got revamped quite a bit in the 1970’s: the Creed and Sermon switched places, the Fraction (or breaking of the bread) was given its own place between the Communion prayers and the distribution, the Gloria in excelsis Deo moved from being an anthem at the end to a hymn of praise near the beginning (as in the Roman Rite), the Offertory moved after the Prayers and Confession. And so, in deference to the majority of our history, the 2019 Prayer Brook allows us to re-order the Anglican Standard Text to match the order of a previous authorized Prayer Book. This gives a few major options:

  1. The order of the first prayer book (1549)
  2. The standard English prayer book (1662)
  3. The first & second American prayer books (1789 & 1892)
  4. The third American prayer book (1928)

There are a few other historical options from England and Canada and Scotland, but they are almost identical to others already listed here.

Would I ever want to make use of this permission? And if so, what would be the justification for such meddling? The downsides are obvious:

  • People get tripped up easily when familiar material gets rearranged
  • I, the celebrant, am much more prone to making mistakes when I do something different from the norm
  • Parents trying to manage small children during the service have a harder time keeping up when their full attention isn’t able to be on the order of service

So if we choose to utilize these other options, it needs to be for a very good reason. After all, the rubrics permitting this change exists primarily to service those parishes that are already used to a different order and want to keep it, despite switching over to the 2019 Prayer Book.

I have two main reasons for wanting to make occasional use of the historic orders.

  1. INSTRUCTION: Both in terms of personal awareness as well as historical honesty, I think it’s good for ordinary worshipers to be exposed to samples of “the way things were” on occasion. It’s good to know that the Modern Way is not the Only Way, and to appreciate at least some of the differences that have arisen in the details of our patterns of worship over the centuries.
  2. FORMATION: Despite my preference for stability over variety, there is a value to “shaking things up” a little bit from time to time. Re-arranging a little bit of the worship service according to an historic pattern forces people to pay attention in a way that they normally may not. Hearing and saying familiar prayers in a different sequence than usual can help bring out different emphases that would be missed otherwise.

To implement the inclusion of these alternative orders, though, it struck me as too arbitrary to assign certain orders to certain Sundays of the year. So instead I assigned them to certain groups of minor feast days:

  1. The 1662 Order is for British Saints
  2. The 1549 Order is for other Western Saints
  3. The 1789/1892 Order is for Eastern Saints
  4. The 1928 Order is for Angels, Eve of All Saints, the Faithful Departed

The general logic behind this is that the 1662 order is the most uniquely English liturgy, so it befits the British Saints, the 1549 Eucharistic Rite is more generically Western, the early American Prayer Books (influenced by the Scottish order) has a slight Eastern element to it, and the 1928 prayers give a little more attention to the departed than its predecessors. Plus, by tying these alternative arrangements of the service order to minor saints days, we get a special way of acknowledging these commemorations when they happen to land on a Sunday without actually directly observing them and interrupting the calendar year.

So for example earlier this year August 20th was on a Sunday, and that was the commemoration of St. Bernard of Clairvaux. So on that day we used the 1549 order of service to denote his commemoration, though the Scripture lessons and sermon remained in the regular Sunday sequence (I was preaching through Romans at the time). The next time this’ll happen for my church is on January 28th, on which day we’ll again use the 1549 order this time to celebrate St. Thomas Aquinas, a giant of Western Medieval theology. And then in March we’ll use this method to denote St. Patrick’s Day as well!

This approach gives you maybe three or four Sundays per year with historic orders, which is rare enough that it’s not destabilizing the congregation’s ability to follow the regular liturgy, but often enough that they kinda-sorta remember “I think we’ve done this before”. That way it’s a little jarring (“oh right, I have to pay careful attention to follow this”) but not overwhelming and having-to-start-from-scratch each time.

SUMMARY THOUGHT

So that’s generally how I go about trying to balance variety and stability. I’m not saying this is a perfect system that everyone should try to emulate, but I think these are sound ideas that provide just enough variation without throwing people off too much. It really matters to me that people get to know our liturgy, grow to cherish its prayers, and make them their own – and sometimes you need both familiar repetition as well as fresh encounters to make that happen.

Beyond Sunday Communion part 4: Morning Prayer & Litany & Communion

The Prayer Book tradition of worship is rich and robust, providing not only rites and rituals for individual worship services but indeed for an entire life of Christian worship. As a part of this ambitious large-scale schema, it should come as no surprise that there’s more to worship than simply going to Holy Communion every Sunday morning. There are the daily rounds of prayer, punctuated by the [Great] Litany a couple times per week, various pastoral offices for key stages in the natural and spiritual lives of a congregation and family, and pointers toward the development of private devotions to enable the individual worshiper to flesh out his or her own life of worship apart from the gathered Church.

What is often missed in today’s church culture, however, is that the original Prayer Book pattern for worship on Sunday morning was actually a three-part affair: Morning Prayer, The [Great] Litany, and the Holy Communion. Until relatively recent times, all three of these were appointed to be said in every church every Sunday and Holy Day. Granted, this was often shortened in actual practice, and by the late 19th century it was probably more common for people to attend just one service rather than all three in a row. Yet the full pattern of worship is still present even in our modern Prayer Books, and the typical malnourished Christian of today could benefit greatly from a retrieval of the spiritual rigor of our forebears. To that end, we’ve been looking at different combinations of worship services that you could carry out on Sunday mornings in your church.

Morning Prayer & The Litany & Holy Communion

We’re wrapping up this sequence of articles by going for the gold: how might you run a 100% Authentic Anglican (TM) Sunday Morning Worship Service? I’m going to present three ideas on how to execute this trilogy of Prayer Book services: the start-and-stop approach, the compound marathon, and the finessed liturgy.

The Start-and-Stop Approach

I would consider this the ideal for Sunday morning worship, personally. You start with Morning Prayer by the book, with a little bit of music. Then there’s a little break for study, discussion, catechesis, whatever’s going on. Then you return to the pews and kneel for the Great Litany. But rather than concluding the Litany outright, you open it up for spontaneous prayer. Or if the congregation is charismatic-influenced, open it up for prayer and praise! After the reading and studying of the Word in Morning Prayer and the long detailed prayer coverage of the Litany, and with the climax of the Eucharist ahead, this is also a perfect opportunity for the Rites of Healing: offering sacramental confession and the anointing of the sick. Then, after another breather, it’s time for the full Communion service.

While this would be quite a full morning for all involved, there are mitigating factors worth considering. First of all, the priest doesn’t have to lead everything! He should be present to pronounce absolution in Morning Prayer, available for ministry after the Litany, and only then must he take up the mantle to officiant Holy Communion. As for the congregation, not everyone necessarily comes to all three services. Prospective members and “seekers” will receive the instruction and prayer they need in the first two services; Holy Communion isn’t for them yet. Lots of people would probably still show up only for the Communion portion and skip the first two. But imagine the robust spirituality that would be fostered in those who did show up for all three! What a blessing that could be to the church and the community.

The Compound Marathon

Like the first approach, the Compound Marathon is a walk-through of the Morning Office, Litany, and Communion in full, one after another, with no breaks in between. You could omit the closing sentences from Morning Prayer, just so it doesn’t feel too much like you’re sending everyone away 1/3 of the way through, but otherwise this is literally three worship services in a row.

This is the least attractive idea to my sensibilities. With no transitions between each service, people will be very aware of an awkward “we’re done, but we’re not done” sense and the overall impression will probably be very foreign to everyone involved.

But it is the simplest way to bring the three services together. The less verbal guidance required to help the congregation through the liturgy, the better, so finishing out each service before moving on to the next is going to be the path of least confusion. This is also the most instructive approach: those who’ve never experienced Morning Prayer or the Litany before will get to experience them both in full without anything clipped out! In that light we find where this strange idea might actually make sense: the church could make a special occasion of “exploring the fulness of our tradition of worship” and do Morning Prayer, Litany, and Communion all together as a one-off special event.

The Finessed Liturgy

But if you want to use all three liturgies together on a regular basis, and/or the congregation is already at least somewhat familiar with them, then you’re best off following the actual rubrics when it comes to moving from one service to the next.

Morning Prayer starts off on page 11 and runs until (but not including) the Prayer for Mission on page 24. Then the Litany begins (page 91) and runs through the Kyrie on page 96. At that point, the Communion service begins with the Collect of the Day on page 107/125.

Additionally, some other factors could be considered:

  • The Confession & Creed may be omitted from the Office.
  • The Psalms and Lessons in Morning Prayer may be able to be shortened.
  • Reading the Canticles is much quicker than singing them.
  • The Great Litany can be lengthened or shortened at the officiant’s preference, so abbreviating its intercessions is a legitimate move, as long as the congregation is able to follow you.
  • A hymn (or the Gloria) might sit nicely between the Litany and the Eucharist’s Collect of the Day.
  • The Prayers of the People in the Communion liturgy technically aren’t supposed to be skipped, but in light of all the prayer that has come before you’d be well within your rights to shorten them drastically.

This sounds super long, yes. But don’t be intimidated! The two biggest time-sinks in a worship are the sermon and the singing. And remember that the great majority of the Prayer Book liturgy is about reading and praying the Word of God (Scriptures) to the Word of God (Jesus), so there’s no such thing as time wasted there.

Personal note in conclusion

Of all the combinations, this is the one I’ve never tried before in my church, I must admit. On paper, I was set to try it out a couple times, but I always chickened out. Someday I probably will muster up my resolve and give it a go, and when I do I will almost certainly use the Finessed Liturgy approach, as well as clearly identify the Sunday ahead of time with a special reason for observing the full tradition of Prayer Book worship. It may be a special holy day, or a historically-minded occasion. And I will make it clear that it’s a once-time event so as not to scare my flock with an unasked-for spiritual workout in overdrive. If I were to make the observance of all three services a regular part of parish life, I’d separate them out (as in the first approach) to provide space for particular ministerial and practical needs in between.

Beyond Sunday Communion part 3: Morning Prayer & Holy Communion

The Prayer Book tradition of worship is rich and robust, providing not only rites and rituals for individual worship services but indeed for an entire life of Christian worship. As a part of this ambitious large-scale schema, it should come as no surprise that there’s more to worship than simply going to Holy Communion every Sunday morning. There are the daily rounds of prayer, punctuated by the [Great] Litany a couple times per week, various pastoral offices for key stages in the natural and spiritual lives of a congregation and family, and pointers toward the development of private devotions to enable the individual worshiper to flesh out his or her own life of worship apart from the gathered Church.

What is often missed in today’s church culture, however, is that the original Prayer Book pattern for worship on Sunday morning was actually a three-part affair: Morning Prayer, The [Great] Litany, and the Holy Communion. Until relatively recent times, all three of these were appointed to be said in every church every Sunday and Holy Day. Granted, this was often shortened in actual practice, and by the late 19th century it was probably more common for people to attend just one service rather than all three in a row. Yet the full pattern of worship is still present even in our modern Prayer Books, and the typical malnourished Christian of today could benefit greatly from a retrieval of the spiritual rigor of our forebears. To that end, we’ll be looking at different combinations of worship services that you could carry out on Sunday mornings in your church.

Morning Prayer & Holy Communion

The most complicated pairing of traditional Prayer Book services is that of Morning Prayer and Holy Communion. The American Prayer Book of 1928 hints of the concept of running the two services together but provides no rubrics on how this is meant to be done. The 1979 Prayer Book finally followed that up with a set of instructions: cut the Morning Prayer service off after the collects and before the Prayer for Mission, and then start the Offertory of the Communion liturgy (1979 BCP page 142). Additional Prayers might be expected in between, however, to ensure the requirements for the Prayers of the People be fulfilled. The practical result of this schema is that the Daily Office serves as the “Liturgy of the Word” within the Communion service.

However, the framers of the 2019 Prayer Book consciously and intentionally did not repeat that rubric. They asserted that the integrity of the Daily and Communion offices should be maintained, and there was nothing to be gained by blending them together like that. So now we have an interesting situation, because on pages 24 and 50 of our Prayer Book we still have the same rubric as in 1979: “Unless the… Eucharist is to follow, one of the following prayers for mission is added.” So if you want to combine Morning Prayer and Holy Communion into one worship service, the Office ends at the same place as it does for switching to the Litany, which is the same place the original Office ended, which is the same place as the 1979 Book to move on to the Offertory in Holy Communion. Except in our case, the “Liturgy of the Word” in Holy Communion can’t be overwritten. This leaves us with a curious range of options.

First, literally start at the very beginning of the Communion service. You could smooth the transition a little by singing a hymn to be the hinge: functioning both as the Anthem near the end of the Office and the Opening Hymn of the Eucharist. Needless to say this is the longest option in terms of the worship service’s duration. Though the other options aren’t going to be all that much shorter.

Second, skip everything you’re allowed to skip. If you want to remain obedient to the rubrics, but try your hardest to shorten this combined service, here are the things you can skip:

  • The Confession in Morning Prayer
  • The Apostles’ Creed in Morning Prayer
  • The Gloria in Excelsis Deo in the Communion service
  • The Comfortable Words and certain other marked prayers during the celebration of Communion

This is often overlooked by liturgy planners, but the real key to “saving time” when you’re concerned about a worship service lasting too long is not about breezing through the Prayers and skipping sections of the liturgy. The biggest time-user is music. This is especially true in the modern charismatic-influenced evangelical tradition – those songs can go on much longer even than the old hymns! So if you’re the sort who’s concerned about attention span and a set “finish time”, look at how you can reel in the music, rather than cut corners with the actual canonical liturgy.

That said, there is something to be said for the spirit of the rubrics rather than just the letter. Along those lines, here are some other things to consider to smooth the transition from Morning Prayer to Holy Communion and make it feel a bit more unified and a bit less repetitive.

  • Use the Confession in Morning Prayer instead of the Communion (that way you can skip a bunch of the follow-up material, including that oft-time-consuming Peace!)
  • Trim the Prayers of the People (after all Morning Prayer does have some basic intercessions built in already)
  • Alternatively, chop off all the prayers from Morning Prayer (concluding it with the second lesson & canticle, and then moving on to the Communion. This way you get the benefit of the extra Scripture readings and none of the prayers thereafter which will get duplicated.)

In my early years as a priest, I tried out all three of those last ideas (possibly all at once). I did this on a couple festive Sundays of the year – Christmas, Easter, Ascension, Pentecost, Trinity, All Saints’ Sunday – for the benefit of getting two different collects of the day (in most of those cases) and extra Scripture lessons. I thought it’d be a good way to heighten the celebration of the high holy days in a way that was both Bible-centered and Prayer Book -honoring, analogous to how the especially penitential Sundays would be punctuated by the Great Litany.

Unlike my appointing of the Litany, however, the Morning Prayer + Holy Communion combo pack did not last. It’s significantly longer, it’s clunkier, and on the days that I appointed this there was usually a lot of wonderful music that we wanted to sing as well. It may be that the Office & Eucharist combination would work better in a low-music setting. It may be that this combination may better be achieved as two separated worship services with a time for Bible Study or Sunday School or Catechesis in between.

Or, hey, maybe you actually do want to plan a worship that’s 1½-2 hours long, and then a full Morning Office with a full Eucharist back-to-back is a perfectly Anglican way to achieve that!

Beyond Sunday Communion part 2: Morning Prayer & Litany

The Prayer Book tradition of worship is rich and robust, providing not only rites and rituals for individual worship services but indeed for an entire life of Christian worship. As a part of this ambitious large-scale schema, it should come as no surprise that there’s more to worship than simply going to Holy Communion every Sunday morning. There are the daily rounds of prayer, punctuated by the [Great] Litany a couple times per week, various pastoral offices for key stages in the natural and spiritual lives of a congregation and family, and pointers toward the development of private devotions to enable the individual worshiper to flesh out his or her own life of worship apart from the gathered Church.

What is often missed in today’s church culture, however, is that the original Prayer Book pattern for worship on Sunday morning was actually a three-part affair: Morning Prayer, The [Great] Litany, and the Holy Communion. Until relatively recent times, all three of these were appointed to be said in every church every Sunday and Holy Day. Granted, this was often shortened in actual practice, and by the late 19th century it was probably more common for people to attend just one service rather than all three in a row. Yet the full pattern of worship is still present even in our modern Prayer Books, and the typical malnourished Christian of today could benefit greatly from a retrieval of the spiritual rigor of our forebears. To that end, we’ll be looking at different combinations of worship services that you could carry out on Sunday mornings in your church.

Morning Prayer & The Litany

Let’s say the priest is on vacation. You could get a supply priest from elsewhere in the diocese to fill in for him, sure, but there are plenty of homegrown options available as well. How about save the parish a little money, time, and effort, and instead whole Prayer Book services that don’t require a priest? Take advantage of the situation as an opportunity, and make use of the other two Anglican services traditionally expected on Sunday morning: the Morning Office and the Great Litany!

Of all the possible combinations of services, this is the easiest one to work out. You proceed through Morning Prayer normally, and when you get to the rubric on page 24 (right before the Prayer for Mission) you skip over to page 91 and start the Litany. Simple!

There are really only two questions to ask yourself in the course of such a plan.

First: do we want to pause between the collects and the start of the Litany? In the original Prayer Book, the Daily Office ends with those collects, so anything else that followed it was extra. Singing an anthem at that point would have been perfectly natural, and indeed has remained a staple of Choral Evensong and Sung Mattins to this day. This is also the traditional point at which to include a sermon. The sequence could therefore be:

  1. Morning Prayer through the collects
  2. Hymn or anthem
  3. Sermon or Homily or Bible Study
  4. The Great Litany

The other question is: how do we want to conclude the Litany? Ever since 1928, the final section of the Litany has been cordoned off under a subheading (“The Supplication”) and rendered optional. As you prepare a Sunday service composed of the Office and Litany, you have to decide whether to include the Supplication or not. The rubrics in the center of page 97 explain where the Supplication supplants the shorter ending. The simplest explanation is that the top half of page 97 is the shorter ending, and the bottom of half of page 97 (leading to page 98) comprise the longer ending.

Because the Supplication is particularly “gloomy” – praying for aid against danger, and deliverance from unnamed afflictions, I recommend including it throughout Advent, Lent, and any other penitential occasion. In my own practice, I always include the Supplication whenever I pray the Litany on a Friday, and always skip it on Wednesdays. Again, find a pattern that works for you and your congregation, remembering that what is normal and familiar is sometimes best, and sometimes familiar normality needs to be challenged.

Beyond Sunday Communion part 1: The Litany & Communion

The Prayer Book tradition of worship is rich and robust, providing not only rites and rituals for individual worship services but indeed for an entire life of Christian worship. As a part of this ambitious large-scale schema, it should come as no surprise that there’s more to worship than simply going to Holy Communion every Sunday morning. There are the daily rounds of prayer, punctuated by the [Great] Litany a couple times per week, various pastoral offices for key stages in the natural and spiritual lives of a congregation and family, and pointers toward the development of private devotions to enable the individual worshiper to flesh out his or her own life of worship apart from the gathered Church.

What is often missed in today’s church culture, however, is that the original Prayer Book pattern for worship on Sunday morning was actually a three-part affair: Morning Prayer, The [Great] Litany, and the Holy Communion. Until relatively recent times, all three of these were appointed to be said in every church every Sunday and Holy Day. Granted, this was often shortened in actual practice, and by the late 19th century it was probably more common for people to attend just one service rather than all three in a row. Yet the full pattern of worship is still present even in our modern Prayer Books, and the typical malnourished Christian of today could benefit greatly from a retrieval of the spiritual rigor of our forebears. To that end, we’ll be looking at different combinations of worship services that you could carry out on Sunday mornings in your church.

The Litany & Holy Communion

Perhaps the simplest combination of Anglican traditional rites is the use of the Great Litany with the Communion service. The Litany is a longish prayer list with full congregational participation throughout. It’s repetitive to the modern sensibility, but instructively thorough and succinct – a real balm for the “Father God we just—” prayers that often ramble on too long in current popular evangelical practice. There are three main ways that the Litany may be appended to the Communion service.

The first and probably least desirable method of including the Litany in the Communion liturgy is to replace the Prayers of the People with the Great Litany – starting at its beginning (page 91) and ending it just before the Kyrie on page 96. This is not how the Litany was or is meant to be used, and this has no historical precedence. I mention this only because it is permitted by the Communion rubrics to replace the Prayers of the People with something else that meets certain standards, the Litany easily fulfills those standards, and a congregation who has never seen the Litany before in their entire lives might be most easily introduced to it in a familiar spot in the known Communion liturgy.

The second and third ways to bring the Litany into Sunday worship, connected to the Communion service, is by starting with the Litany itself and switching over to the Communion at a certain point.

One way to do this is to treat the Great Litany as if it were a “hymn, psalm, or anthem” at the start of the worship service. You go through as much of the Litany as you want, using whichever ending you prefer to choose (the rubrics on page 97 note what these two endings are), and after that begin the Communion service at the Acclamation. This has the benefit of simplicity and breadth of coverage: the congregation experiences the Litany in its full, nothing of the regular service is omitted, and (as a handy bonus) they’ll experience the two worship services most closely to how the historic Prayer Books intended for them to be observed. The downside, of course, is the length of all this. Plus the stop-and-start where Litany ends and Communion starts may be a jarring experience for a congregation unused to the larger breadth of Prayer Book worship.

Lastly, the other approach is to utilize the rubric on page 96, which direct that the Litany be terminated there at the Kyrie and the Communion liturgy picked up at the salutation leading into the Collect of the Day. This is the “combo-pack” invented for the 1979 Prayer Book, and honestly makes for a smooth transition from one service to the other, thanks especially to the Kyrie being a familiar component to both orders functioning as a hinge linking them together. The 1979 Prayer Book further allowed the Prayers of the People to be skipped when the Litany is used like this, though our 2019 Book has not retained that particular allowance.

In my own experience, I have used (parts of) the Litany in place of the Prayers of the People once or twice, but most often I go with the third, rubrical, choice. With occasional exception, I appoint the Litany seven times a year: Advent 1, Epiphany 3, Lent 1, Lent 5, Easter 6 (Rogation), Proper 10, and Proper 20. This way, my flock develops at least a little familiarity with the Litany without feeling overburdened by a lengthy devotion that “nobody else has to do!” You may find another pattern of use may suit your context better. The Additional Directions on page 99 provide a few suggestions to this end, also.